RiffTrax Forum
 

"Game of Thrones" - HBO Series Coming in 2011

Started by Thrashalla, September 16, 2010, 11:13:40 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

wurwolf

Bonhead #2
fs!!


TeamRAD

"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." - Einstein

wurwolf

Quote from: Imrahil on June 07, 2011, 09:01:39 PM
Quote from: wurwolf on June 07, 2011, 10:43:30 AM
I'll pass.

It's gonna be the final frontier of TV nudity.

And I'm sure if anyone will boldly venture forth, it will be HBO.
Bonhead #2
fs!!


wurwolf

WTF? Seriously. This show is twelve kinds of jacked up.
Bonhead #2
fs!!


Kete

Quote from: wurwolf on June 13, 2011, 07:42:32 AM
WTF? Seriously. This show is twelve kinds of jacked up.
I haven't seen yesterday's episode.  Now I'm intrigued.  Are you talking about a plot point or another Littlefinger exposition?

wurwolf

Quote from: Kete on June 13, 2011, 08:47:36 AM
Quote from: wurwolf on June 13, 2011, 07:42:32 AM
WTF? Seriously. This show is twelve kinds of jacked up.
I haven't seen yesterday's episode.  Now I'm intrigued.  Are you talking about a plot point or another Littlefinger exposition?

I'm talking about... shit. I can't say it. Just watch yesterday's episode.

Seriously, what the hell is wrong with this show.
Bonhead #2
fs!!


Jinto

Quote from: wurwolf on June 13, 2011, 09:08:19 AM
Quote from: Kete on June 13, 2011, 08:47:36 AM
Quote from: wurwolf on June 13, 2011, 07:42:32 AM
WTF? Seriously. This show is twelve kinds of jacked up.
I haven't seen yesterday's episode.  Now I'm intrigued.  Are you talking about a plot point or another Littlefinger exposition?

I'm talking about... shit. I can't say it. Just watch yesterday's episode.

Seriously, what the hell is wrong with this show.

I'll tell you what's "wrong" with it. It keeps defying your expectations. It gives meaning back to the phrase "plot twist", where so many other shows and movies have watered it down to mean, at most "well gee, person A was NOT person B's long lost sibling, but in fact person C's offspring! <exaggerated gasps of feigned surprise>". (... yawn ...)

The books are like this too. You start thinking you know what's going to happen next, and then the story tells you, in no uncertain terms, "no, you don't".

And this is GOOD.  >:D

It's also the reason why people who have read the books or watched the show already, find it difficult to talk about the story (in either medium) without spoiling something. Even seemingly innocuous factoids can clue someone in earlier than they should be to future events, thus ruining some of the suspense.

Imagine mentioning something seemingly trivial, like Gandalf"s new look (all white) in LotR after he returns to someone who's only watched the first movie. You've given away two facts: a) he returns, so therefore he's not dead (a common cliche in stories), and b) something has changed about him, and according to cliche this means he's most likely "powered up". So since now the person you told knows he's not the same as he was before, you've ruined the "surprise" at not only seeing him again, but seeing the changes. This may be a very minor thing in LotR with all it's predictability, but now think of doing something similar with GoT. Not so easy to avoid spoiling is it?

Kete

Quote from: Jinto on June 13, 2011, 09:48:06 AM
It's also the reason why people who have read the books or watched the show already, find it difficult to talk about the story (in either medium) without spoiling something. Even seemingly innocuous factoids can clue someone in earlier than they should be to future events, thus ruining some of the suspense.

My wife is 1 book ahead of me right now.  She'll just mention a person's name, and I'll get after her about spoilers.  If you say a name, I know that they're not dead!!

Jinto

Quote from: Kete on June 13, 2011, 09:52:47 AM
Quote from: Jinto on June 13, 2011, 09:48:06 AM
It's also the reason why people who have read the books or watched the show already, find it difficult to talk about the story (in either medium) without spoiling something. Even seemingly innocuous factoids can clue someone in earlier than they should be to future events, thus ruining some of the suspense.

My wife is 1 book ahead of me right now.  She'll just mention a person's name, and I'll get after her about spoilers.  If you say a name, I know that they're not dead!!

Which isn't usually a problem in most cliche stories where you expect that, but with GoT, well....  >:D

wurwolf

Quote from: Jinto on June 13, 2011, 09:48:06 AM
Quote from: wurwolf on June 13, 2011, 09:08:19 AM
Quote from: Kete on June 13, 2011, 08:47:36 AM
Quote from: wurwolf on June 13, 2011, 07:42:32 AM
WTF? Seriously. This show is twelve kinds of jacked up.
I haven't seen yesterday's episode.  Now I'm intrigued.  Are you talking about a plot point or another Littlefinger exposition?

I'm talking about... shit. I can't say it. Just watch yesterday's episode.

Seriously, what the hell is wrong with this show.

I'll tell you what's "wrong" with it. It keeps defying your expectations. It gives meaning back to the phrase "plot twist", where so many other shows and movies have watered it down to mean, at most "well gee, person A was NOT person B's long lost sibling, but in fact person C's offspring! <exaggerated gasps of feigned surprise>". (... yawn ...)

The books are like this too. You start thinking you know what's going to happen next, and then the story tells you, in no uncertain terms, "no, you don't".

And this is GOOD.  >:D

It's also the reason why people who have read the books or watched the show already, find it difficult to talk about the story (in either medium) without spoiling something. Even seemingly innocuous factoids can clue someone in earlier than they should be to future events, thus ruining some of the suspense.

Imagine mentioning something seemingly trivial, like Gandalf"s new look (all white) in LotR after he returns to someone who's only watched the first movie. You've given away two facts: a) he returns, so therefore he's not dead (a common cliche in stories), and b) something has changed about him, and according to cliche this means he's most likely "powered up". So since now the person you told knows he's not the same as he was before, you've ruined the "surprise" at not only seeing him again, but seeing the changes. This may be a very minor thing in LotR with all it's predictability, but now think of doing something similar with GoT. Not so easy to avoid spoiling is it?


This is what I meant, but with less smugness and pomposity.
Bonhead #2
fs!!


D.B. Barnes

Oh no you didn't Thrones!!!



My appetite for fictional revenge knows no bounds.
VIVA IL ESORDIO DEL DIABETE ADULTO DUCE!!!

Jinto

Quote from: wurwolf on June 13, 2011, 10:05:43 AM
This is what I meant, but with less smugness and pomposity.

Clarifying exposition in the future may decrease the likelihood of misinterpretation of (apparently) rhetorical questions being perceived as eliciting postulating elucidation.

::)    ;D


and now for something completely different. randomness, because I feel like being silly:

"A bannister always frames its steps!"

dignan


Ortega

I liked seeing Tyrion being forced into battle, even though he had no business on the field in the first place.  I also like the scene with Brom in the tent with T's new "girl".


I DID NOT WANT the last scene.  In one hand, it takes balls to do that.  On the other, it makes me a sad panda.

wurwolf

Quote from: dignan on June 13, 2011, 04:21:17 PM
I AM NOT HAPPY.



Except not with a happy face. More like this:  :scared:

Can we talk about it yet? Has everyone seen it? I'm going to talk about it.

Bonhead #2
fs!!