RiffTrax Forum
 

The Dark Knight (SPOILERS)

Started by Rufus T, July 29, 2007, 10:04:15 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Tripe

#975
Quote from: RoninFox on August 10, 2008, 03:38:10 PM
Quote from: Chaos on August 10, 2008, 03:21:38 PM
Quote from: torgosPizza on August 10, 2008, 03:18:04 PM
Quote from: Earth President Richard M. Nixon on August 10, 2008, 12:32:18 PM
Ah,see you've unfortunately been exposed to productions by people operating under the misapprehension I discribed earlier:
Does that mean "read and seen faithful adaptations of several of the more famous ones?" If so, then you're correct.
How could they be faithful adaptations? Was the person who directed it alive 410 years ago when Shakespeare's troupe actually performed the original rendition? ;)
Yeah, a true faithful adaptation would have to include the actors improvising to please the loud rude people in the front and avoid having pennies thrown at them.

And that's what I'm talking about, those "Faithful" adaptations aren't really faithful at all, they're faithful to the images of Shakespeare created by Schlegel, the romantics and a few theatrical knights.

I can't recommend the book Roaring Boys enough, it's a really good intro to the world of the Elizabethan and Jacobean theatre.

Sadly, as it's a introduction, it never really delves into the Gallifreyan influence on the stage at that time ;)

Oh and while you're at it, read some Middleton too, he doesn't get half the attention he should :)

Fortis

Quote from: Chaos on August 10, 2008, 02:30:12 PM
Except of course that Shakespeare was simultaneously better with words than Tolkein

While normally I would have to agree with you considering Shakespeare and Tolkien's works as a whole...I have found that there are some passages in Lord of the Rings and the Silmarillion that surpass Shakespeare in every way when it comes to flowing beautiful dialogue...

I've found that sometimes Tolkien's writing is far smoother and more fun to read than Shakespeare's. The words Shakespeare chose to use are far harsher sounding than those Tolkien used. (Latin based words just don't sound that great compared to some old english words)

My english teachers hated me for always saying this to them...

...Iambic Pentameter is boring  :-\


But that's just my take on it, I'm not sure there are that many people who would side with me on this issue. As much as Shakespeare was brilliant (I loved reading him in school because I made a game out of finding out all the crass he had in his plays and laughing about them...seriously, him and Chaucer really shouldn't be read in schools...they were pervs) I just prefer Tolkien.


Dim of the Yard

Quote from: Fortis on August 10, 2008, 09:58:22 PM
My english teachers hated me for always saying this to them...

...Iambic Pentameter is boring  :-\

Oh, I disagree, but for fun reasons.  You know what else is in iambic pentameter?  Emily Dickinson's poetry.  And what ELSE is in iambic pentameter?  The Gilligan's Island theme song.  I find it very hard to believe that iambic pentameter is boring after singing "I Saw A Fly Buzz When I Died" to the tune of Gilligan's Island.

Fortis

Quote from: Dim of the Yard on August 10, 2008, 10:17:53 PM
Quote from: Fortis on August 10, 2008, 09:58:22 PM
My english teachers hated me for always saying this to them...

...Iambic Pentameter is boring  :-\

Oh, I disagree, but for fun reasons.  You know what else is in iambic pentameter?  Emily Dickinson's poetry.  And what ELSE is in iambic pentameter?  The Gilligan's Island theme song.  I find it very hard to believe that iambic pentameter is boring after singing "I Saw A Fly Buzz When I Died" to the tune of Gilligan's Island.

Ah man...I wish I'd thought of that when I was in high school (I always resented my english teachers for not let us use our creativity, especially since they were making me resent writing so much in spite of how much I loved it...until I learned that I could do what my english teachers wanted...and be creative in doing it. I learned everything they had to teach me...did well in class, and then did my own research on the side so that I could argue with them through discussions in class, and essays, why I thought that Shakespeare was a hack...I don't really think that, I just had fun explaining to my teachers why their beloved shakespeare was not as great as they thought, and why a lot of stuff people think he did amazingly...Tolkien did better)

...but yeah...I wish I would have thought about comparing Shakespeare to the Gilligan's Island theme song.



...on a slightly funny side note, my english teachers always called me Frodo (completely unrelated to the Tolkien/Shakespeare compare and contrast), because we were taking a test on Romeo and Juliet the day after I went and saw Return of the King at midnight (I was going on two hours of sleep), and I accidentally wrote Frodo as an answer instead of Romeo, ever since then that nickname stuck with me in my english classes. So now, I have a group of people that sneak into those teachers classrooms and write really big on the white board "Frodo Lives." Just as a little reminder of their favorite english student...heh, my teachers really liked and disliked me (Dislike: I was disruptive)(Like: I was interesting)

Raven

Quote from: RoninFox on August 10, 2008, 03:38:10 PM
How could they be faithful adaptations? Was the person who directed it alive 410 years ago when Shakespeare's troupe actually performed the original rendition? ;)

Yeah, a true faithful adaptation would have to include the actors improvising to please the loud rude people in the front and avoid having pennies thrown at them.
[/quote]

And there would probably be a lot of juggling.

Tripe

Quote from: Raven on August 10, 2008, 11:51:01 PM
Quote from: RoninFox on August 10, 2008, 03:38:10 PM
Yeah, a true faithful adaptation would have to include the actors improvising to please the loud rude people in the front and avoid having pennies thrown at them.
And there would probably be a lot of juggling.

And performing bears.

Chaos

Fortis,

It's true, a lot of Tolkein's passages are beautiful and wonderfully written. The difference is that pretty much ALL of Shakespeare's stuff is around the same caliber, whereas Tolkein only surpasses Shakespeare some of the time. Also, Shakespeare is a better storyteller at the same time. As far as Tolkein was concerned the story was sort of an inconvenient disturbance that distracted from what was really important to him (the language and to a lesser extent the history). If it would have sold, I have a strong feeling that Tolkein wouldn't have written Lord of the Rings at all, but instead just a book full of nothing but the exploration of language, arts, and poetry. But it wouldn't, so he wrote one of the greatest epics of the modern age instead.

Also you have to remember that, while Iambic Pentameter is indeed quite boring, Shakespeare managed to do everything he did with his words WITHIN that very strict confine, while still managing to sound like completely natural language (for the time period). The most hilarious thing I have ever seen in my life was an actor who actually tried to PERFORM speaking with the "de-duh, de-duh, de-duh, de-duh" rhythm. Tool. ;)
"First there was Chaos, the vast immeasurable abyss, Outrageous as a sea, dark, wasteful, wild." -Milton

Cosmic Muse

So, what about The Dark Knight? Anyone think it will surpass the original Star Wars movie in terms of Domestic Box Office intake?
Being a genocidal maniac is not one of my turn ons.

Is it weird to hear the Safety Dance in my head watching Game of Thrones?

a pretty girl is like

Quote from: Harley Quin on August 11, 2008, 11:00:55 AM
So, what about The Dark Knight? Anyone think it will surpass the original Star Wars movie in terms of Domestic Box Office intake?

I do.  I think Titanic's record is pretty safe though. 
I'm all out for kicks...and every inch of me spells EXCITEMENT!

Rude

...

I finally just saw this on Saturday. Pretty damn good.

-Rude
"I can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids."http://www.divshare.com/flash/audio?myId=3942804-0e3

Chaos

Quote from: A Pretty Girl Is Like on August 11, 2008, 11:45:42 AM
Quote from: Harley Quin on August 11, 2008, 11:00:55 AM
So, what about The Dark Knight? Anyone think it will surpass the original Star Wars movie in terms of Domestic Box Office intake?

I do.  I think Titanic's record is pretty safe though. 

What's the number to beat? God, that movie sucked. :P
"First there was Chaos, the vast immeasurable abyss, Outrageous as a sea, dark, wasteful, wild." -Milton

a pretty girl is like

Quote from: Chaos on August 11, 2008, 12:17:28 PM
Quote from: A Pretty Girl Is Like on August 11, 2008, 11:45:42 AM
Quote from: Harley Quin on August 11, 2008, 11:00:55 AM
So, what about The Dark Knight? Anyone think it will surpass the original Star Wars movie in terms of Domestic Box Office intake?

I do.  I think Titanic's record is pretty safe though. 

What's the number to beat? God, that movie sucked. :P
$600 million + just for the domestic. 
I'm all out for kicks...and every inch of me spells EXCITEMENT!

MrTorso

Titanic's domestic box office is: $600,788,188
Star Wars' is:$460,998,007
Dark Knight as of today: $441,541,000

I read an article that if it were to beat those movies based on actual amount of tickets sold it would have to do 900 million dollars to beat Star Wars and 1.2 billion dollars to beat Titanic.
Check out my webshop for political, punk, pop culture buttons, patches and more! www.bigmeanpunk.com

Raven

Quote from: MrTorso on August 11, 2008, 12:34:36 PM
Titanic's domestic box office is: $600,788,188
Star Wars' is:$460,998,007
Dark Knight as of today: $441,541,000

I read an article that if it were to beat those movies based on actual amount of tickets sold it would have to do 900 million dollars to beat Star Wars and 1.2 billion dollars to beat Titanic.

You have the numbers flipped.  900 million box office would pass Titanic in tickets sold.  The 1.2 billion would beat Star wars adjusted for inflation.

pezdrake

#989
Quote from: A Pretty Girl Is Like on August 11, 2008, 11:45:42 AM
Quote from: Harley Quin on August 11, 2008, 11:00:55 AM
So, what about The Dark Knight? Anyone think it will surpass the original Star Wars movie in terms of Domestic Box Office intake?

I do.  I think Titanic's record is pretty safe though. 

It would affirm my faith in humanity if it beats Titanic so I really hope it does.  I'm already happy that it has beaten Home Alone.  (It has beaten Home Alone hasn't it?)