The Dark Knight Rises

[Darth Geek]

I get that feeling too. And while normally I would say that Warner Brothers wouldn't do that, they know that a reboot of some kind is the next step. Particularly with them making what will hopefully be a sucessful Superman movie, I am sure they are thinking crossover. And the Nolan Batman does not play well with others.

[Russell]

I get that feeling too. And while normally I would say that Warner Brothers wouldn't do that, they know that a reboot of some kind is the next step. Particularly with them making what will hopefully be a successful Superman movie, I am sure they are thinking crossover. And the Nolan Batman does not play well with others.

A Superman/Batman movie? Fan boy's dream come true, but there's no way they could make a feasible movie out of that.

[shodan]

I get that feeling too. And while normally I would say that Warner Brothers wouldn't do that, they know that a reboot of some kind is the next step. Particularly with them making what will hopefully be a successful Superman movie, I am sure they are thinking crossover. And the Nolan Batman does not play well with others.

A Superman/Batman movie? Fan boy's dream come true, but there's no way they could make a feasible movie out of that.

there are quite a few instances within the comic realm of a superman batman crossover ( and if they got their act together they might be able to produce a justice league movie). the key is to STAY FAITHFUL TO THE COMIC STORY ARC and to HIRE COMPETENT ACTORS.

[Darth Geek]

I get that feeling too. And while normally I would say that Warner Brothers wouldn't do that, they know that a reboot of some kind is the next step. Particularly with them making what will hopefully be a successful Superman movie, I am sure they are thinking crossover. And the Nolan Batman does not play well with others.

A Superman/Batman movie? Fan boy's dream come true, but there's no way they could make a feasible movie out of that.

I think they could. As long as they embrace their differences and their approaches to crime fighting, there is inherant drama there if done well.

[Relaxing Dragon]

I get that feeling too. And while normally I would say that Warner Brothers wouldn't do that, they know that a reboot of some kind is the next step. Particularly with them making what will hopefully be a successful Superman movie, I am sure they are thinking crossover. And the Nolan Batman does not play well with others.

A Superman/Batman movie? Fan boy's dream come true, but there's no way they could make a feasible movie out of that.

I think they could. As long as they embrace their differences and their approaches to crime fighting, there is inherant drama there if done well.

I think that'll definitely be the case. The announced reboot of the series is to be in line with a Justice League movie, so at some point Superman and Batman will be on screen together: http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/mar/30/dark-knight-rises-batman-christopher-nolan

[Variety of Cells]

I get that feeling too. And while normally I would say that Warner Brothers wouldn't do that, they know that a reboot of some kind is the next step. Particularly with them making what will hopefully be a successful Superman movie, I am sure they are thinking crossover. And the Nolan Batman does not play well with others.

A Superman/Batman movie? Fan boy's dream come true, but there's no way they could make a feasible movie out of that.

I think they could. As long as they embrace their differences and their approaches to crime fighting, there is inherant drama there if done well.

.

I think that'll definitely be the case. The announced reboot of the series is to be in line with a Justice League movie, so at some point Superman and Batman will be on screen together: http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/mar/30/dark-knight-rises-batman-christopher-nolan

This bothers me. After watching the Captain America Rifftrax, it seemed that the whole plot of the movie was 'get captain America into the future so we can get it over with and make an avengers movie already'. It felt like it was made because people felt it had to be made to get to something good.  Would be a shame if that happened to batman

[Smith Dr John Smith]

I get that feeling too. And while normally I would say that Warner Brothers wouldn't do that, they know that a reboot of some kind is the next step. Particularly with them making what will hopefully be a successful Superman movie, I am sure they are thinking crossover. And the Nolan Batman does not play well with others.

A Superman/Batman movie? Fan boy's dream come true, but there's no way they could make a feasible movie out of that.

I think they could. As long as they embrace their differences and their approaches to crime fighting, there is inherant drama there if done well.

.

I think that'll definitely be the case. The announced reboot of the series is to be in line with a Justice League movie, so at some point Superman and Batman will be on screen together: http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/mar/30/dark-knight-rises-batman-christopher-nolan

This bothers me. After watching the Captain America Rifftrax, it seemed that the whole plot of the movie was 'get captain America into the future so we can get it over with and make an avengers movie already'. It felt like it was made because people felt it had to be made to get to something good.  Would be a shame if that happened to batman

Really?  I didn't get that at all.  The whole story of the movie was about Captain America in WW2,the future had nothing to do with it.  There were two scenes that took place in the present day and they both took place completely outside of the main story.  In fact you could chop both of them off and the movie would work just fine,it would just be about a hero who gives his life in his mission this time.  You could cut from the kids playing with the shield and instead of fading to the present day fade to the credits and you would still have one of the best superhero movies ever made IMO.

[Darth Geek]

I agree. I think the only thing they really hurt themselves with was that we don't know how long he fought in WW2. It only seemed like a few months. And he was fighting Hydra that whole time. If they do a Captain America 2, I really want to see more of that time period, not him in the present. So it seems like there isn't that much time for them to have a full movie that takes place with him fighting in WW2 and before he got frozen.

[Variety of Cells]

I didn't care for Captain America, and I don't care for a majority of super hero movies, which is probably where we disagree most. Since I didn't care for the movie, to me it seemed to be a very formulaic film with not much care put into any of the other characters. It seemed like they didn't want to spend too much time with any other supporting characters because they would never be seen again after this film. If you enjoyed the film you aren't going to agree with that which is quite understandable and acceptable and not much reason to get much more off the topic of batman... In my opinion.

[Smith Dr John Smith]

I agree. I think the only thing they really hurt themselves with was that we don't know how long he fought in WW2. It only seemed like a few months. And he was fighting Hydra that whole time. If they do a Captain America 2, I really want to see more of that time period, not him in the present. So it seems like there isn't that much time for them to have a full movie that takes place with him fighting in WW2 and before he got frozen.

I think the movie started in 43(we were in Italy at the start of the movie)so I am pretty sure the whole ware was covered if you figure that he was created in 43,went on tour,and then went on the missions against Hydra in 44 that pretty much covers the whole war. We were only really in it for about 4 years so I figured that was the period covered by the film.

[D.B. Barnes]

This is pretty cool.

[Tripe]

I still think that "When Gotham is in ashes..." line is screamingly camp.

La
Dee
Dah

[Darth Geek]

I still think that "When Gotham is in ashes..." line is screamingly camp.

La
Dee
Dah

The line reminds me of the one in Van Helsing when one of the vampire brides says "I say when you can go. And I say you can go when you are DEAD!"

[Russell]

I still think that "When Gotham is in ashes..." line is screamingly camp.

La
Dee
Dah

I get the meaning though, he knows Batman cares about Gotham city, and he won't let him  die until the whole city and its inhabitants are all dead and gone.

[Russell]

Or "I'm here to kick ass and chew bubble gum. And I'm all out of bubble gum. Also, put on these glasses."

If you're implying Bane is some kind of Duke Nukem wannabe.... I'm actually okay with that. I relish in my imagination a moment where he says to Batman "I'm going to rip off your head and shit down your neck... oh, I'm sorry, I don't mean shit, I mean GUANO"