RiffTrax Forum
 

GhostHouse covers

Started by RVR II, February 05, 2012, 07:04:27 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

RVR II


Compound

Well, I haven't done a cover yet, but I did do this:

D.B. Barnes

Quote from: Compound on February 10, 2012, 07:03:24 PM
Well, I haven't done a cover yet, but I did do this:


Needs more vomity bobble heads.
VIVA IL ESORDIO DEL DIABETE ADULTO DUCE!!!

ManUnderMask

I survived the San Diego Comic Con 2010 Hall H stabbing.

TheGreatCosmo

Nice cover, ManUnderMask! Though I am slightly disturbed as it looks like Bill is about to nibble on Mike's ear...   ;D

Here's my attempt at a cover. Click the preview for the full sized image:


Thrifty

I guess I forgot to post mine.


Piobman

#6
Managed to get a hold of a decent copy for screencaps. Enjoy! BTW I will be starting some Blu-ray reauthors. So blu-ray covers will be on the horizon to go with my standard dvd covers.


{CD label, Standard, & Thinpak covers available}

Use search engine on  my Cover Site to download covers.

Bob

Guys, all of you, these are some nice overs......thank you.

Ah......blu-ray or regular covers......should we make two of them......

For the ones I am making, I leave that info off the cover and make things to fit the regular thinpak and alpha width covers.    Do people want them to also be shorter to fit in their blu-ray covers too?

Piobman

Good point Bob! Width is basically the same, but you definitely lose some height. The back description would probably be the biggest hurdle. Oddly enough I will be making a blu-ray cover for Ghosthouse. I'm using a PAL source and have found converting it to blu-ray gets around that whole 25 fps to 29.97/24fps ntsc issue since blurays work in 25fps already! I'll post a blu-ray version tonight for those rare folk (probably noone) who might want to use it.

Thrifty

Why would you make different covers for Blu-Rays?  The discs are the same size.  The only physical difference you see in Blu-Rays is in the smaller cases you get from professionally produced Blu-Rays from the store.

Bob

#10
Good point to Piobman and his size difference thinking and extra work he gave himself.   Those darned blu-rays are wider and shorter than thinpaks.

I can leave the fact that the thinpak covers are a BIT thinner than the blu-ray covers as my main reason for not going to their creation.    If I ever switch my mind..... Oh the heavy job of blu-ray covers I will have!