Star Trek...2013...Yep, it's happening.

[ScottotD]

I will, loved the first one. Pop corn and fun ahoy!

[daltysmilth]

I'll see it in theatres, but I most likely won't spring for 3D.

I'll see it in theatres and in 3D, but I won't get popcorn!  Okay, someone else add to this!

[Russell]

I'll see it in theatres, but I most likely won't spring for 3D.

I'll see it in theatres and in 3D, but I won't get popcorn!  Okay, someone else add to this!

As long as they stop with this "First look" shit by then. I hate that so much. But, I loved Star Trek(2009), I don't care if it was less like Trek and more like Star Wars, it was more like the original Star Wars movies, and that's alright with me.

[RoninFox]

Admittedly the main reason I don't want to spring for 3D that my wife won't want to see it that way (3D gives her headaches, and action movies on a big screen can give her motion sickness without adding 3D glasses induced vertigo to it sometimes.)  The last Star Trek movie came out before I met her, but we both loved it, and I really want to see this one with her.

[sarcasm_made_Easy]

I just hope they have a more compelling villian. 

[Russell]

I just hope they have a more compelling villian.  

Benicio Del Toro.... as Khan? Can you imagine him playing anyone else?

[sarcasm_made_Easy]

I would rather they make up a new villian actually. 

[Russell]

I would rather they make up a new villian actually. 

When it comes to Star Trek, writers are better off sticking with what's familiar. What's most important is the addition of other elements.

[sarcasm_made_Easy]

Nah Some new aspect of the star trek world would be more fun to see than a take on something already deeply familiar. 

[Russell]

Nah Some new aspect of the star trek world would be more fun to see than a take on something already deeply familiar. 

Well, we'll see what they do. I'm sure it's going to kick ass... because this will be an even-numbered trek film, and there's never been a Trek film that was even numbered that SUCKED before........... 

[daltysmilth]

Well, there's never been an even-numbered Star Trek featuring Kirk and the crew that sucked before.

[sarcasm_made_Easy]

Technically there has never been an even numbered film with shatner and nimoy that has sucked before. 

[Russell]

Technically there has never been an even numbered film with shatner and nimoy that has sucked before.  

Very true. and this isn't related to the dubious "Odd-numbered curse". However, as SF debris pointed out, it's always a very bad sign whenever a character or characters sing in a Star Trek movie. That is except for of course The Motion Picture, because the singing would distract from the boredom.

[doggans]

Technically there has never been an even numbered film with shatner and nimoy that has sucked before. 

Can I play? Um, there's never been a feature-length Star Trek musical with David Hasselhoff and the supporting cast of "Becker" that's sucked before!

[RVR II]

Technically there has never been an even numbered film with shatner and nimoy that has sucked before. 

Can I play? Um, there's never been a feature-length Star Trek musical with David Hasselhoff and the supporting cast of "Becker" that's sucked before!

The Hoff would make a perfect Cardassian