login

Author Topic: Worst directors actually employed  (Read 6463 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Natureboy

  • Big Montana
  • *****
  • Posts: 875
  • Liked: 0
  • Intelligent, Sensational
    • Easy Talk Cafe
Re: Worst directors actually employed
« Reply #30 on: February 05, 2007, 09:37:24 AM »
Schumacher has been on both ends of the spectrum:

I liked The Lost Boys and A Time to Kill.

But, look at DC Cab, Flatliners, and Batman and Robin.

Uwe Boll is just a joke......

Michael Bay can direct action scenes, but nothing else.  Bay is a repeat offender of major continuity errors, and he doesn't care.  If you watch Pearl Harbor, when the attack happens.....it was very good, but the 18 hour love triangle between Beckinsale, Affleck, and Hartnet was awful.  His comments about the horrible science in Armegeddon was not a concern to him, which is just unbelieveable.  What kills me is that he releases "director's cut" versions of crap like Pearl Harbor and Armegeddon......which proves he is just evil. 


Offline homerjayla

  • Schnappi Supporter
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
  • Liked: 0
  • Rich in heady goodness!
Re: Worst directors actually employed
« Reply #31 on: February 05, 2007, 01:00:29 PM »
Darren Aronofsky, He did Requiem for a Dream and The Fountain.


Both way too predictable and shitty.
Global warming, where?


Offline sarcasm_made_Easy

  • Compsognathus
  • *****
  • Posts: 10320
  • Liked: 15
Re: Worst directors actually employed
« Reply #32 on: February 05, 2007, 01:00:39 PM »
well we have hit all the usual suspect here, who are the forgotten crappy directors of our time?


Offline BathTub

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 8383
  • Liked: 356
Re: Worst directors actually employed
« Reply #33 on: February 05, 2007, 01:07:17 PM »
Darren Aronofsky, He did Requiem for a Dream and The Fountain.


Both way too predictable and shitty.


The hell? Requiem kicks ass.


Offline sarcasm_made_Easy

  • Compsognathus
  • *****
  • Posts: 10320
  • Liked: 15
Re: Worst directors actually employed
« Reply #34 on: February 05, 2007, 01:09:55 PM »
and what in the hell was even close to predictable about the fountain?  Its meaning is still mildly obscured to me although i have theories i like.


Offline Petey Wheatstraw

  • The FBI Pays Me to Surf
  • *
  • Posts: 2767
  • Liked: 0
  • "SMOG INSPECTION!"
    • Mystic Studios Productions
Re: Worst directors actually employed
« Reply #35 on: February 05, 2007, 01:16:01 PM »
Darren Aronofsky, He did Requiem for a Dream and The Fountain.


Both way too predictable and shitty.

I haven't seen The Foutain, but I really liked Pi and Requiem for a Dream, both excellent films.
This iRiff will only be on sale for another few hours. Get it while it's cheap!



Offline sarcasm_made_Easy

  • Compsognathus
  • *****
  • Posts: 10320
  • Liked: 15
Re: Worst directors actually employed
« Reply #36 on: February 05, 2007, 01:26:45 PM »
If you liked those two then i think the fountain you would probably like.  Its one of those movies youll talk about afterwards.  Its not so much that it didnt make sense its that its all very subjective what some things meant. 


Offline homerjayla

  • Schnappi Supporter
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
  • Liked: 0
  • Rich in heady goodness!
Re: Worst directors actually employed
« Reply #37 on: February 05, 2007, 01:46:47 PM »
If you liked those two then i think the fountain you would probably like.  Its one of those movies youll talk about afterwards.  Its not so much that it didnt make sense its that its all very subjective what some things meant. 

2001 is like that but The Fountain on the other hand........

Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Global warming, where?


Offline sarcasm_made_Easy

  • Compsognathus
  • *****
  • Posts: 10320
  • Liked: 15
Re: Worst directors actually employed
« Reply #38 on: February 05, 2007, 01:52:38 PM »
kinda its more like this

Spoiler (click to show/hide)


Offline Andrew1911

  • Schnappi Supporter
  • ***
  • Posts: 126
  • Liked: 0
Re: Worst directors actually employed
« Reply #39 on: February 06, 2007, 05:54:10 PM »
Darren Aronofsky, He did Requiem for a Dream and The Fountain.


Both way too predictable and shitty.


... Die.


Offline Andrew1911

  • Schnappi Supporter
  • ***
  • Posts: 126
  • Liked: 0
Re: Worst directors actually employed
« Reply #40 on: February 06, 2007, 05:55:08 PM »
and what in the hell was even close to predictable about the fountain?  Its meaning is still mildly obscured to me although i have theories i like.

SPOILER FOR FOUNTAIN LOOK AWAY

Didn't you know his body would turn into leaves? I mean, when I heard of the film, I'm like, "Oh, God, Aronfosky's going to have someone turn into leaves... AGAIN."


Offline sarcasm_made_Easy

  • Compsognathus
  • *****
  • Posts: 10320
  • Liked: 15
Re: Worst directors actually employed
« Reply #41 on: February 06, 2007, 05:57:23 PM »
Psssst  they have a spoiler tag  ;)


well i sure didnt know did he do that in another one of his movies?  Or was that sarcasm?  I cant tell right now, i havent had me caffine for the day guvna


Offline Andrew1911

  • Schnappi Supporter
  • ***
  • Posts: 126
  • Liked: 0
Re: Worst directors actually employed
« Reply #42 on: February 06, 2007, 05:57:56 PM »
If you liked those two then i think the fountain you would probably like.  Its one of those movies youll talk about afterwards.  Its not so much that it didnt make sense its that its all very subjective what some things meant. 

2001 is like that but The Fountain on the other hand........

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Spoiler (click to show/hide)


Offline Andrew1911

  • Schnappi Supporter
  • ***
  • Posts: 126
  • Liked: 0
Re: Worst directors actually employed
« Reply #43 on: February 06, 2007, 05:58:20 PM »
Psssst  they have a spoiler tag  ;)


well i sure didnt know did he do that in another one of his movies?  Or was that sarcasm?  I cant tell right now, i havent had me caffine for the day guvna

Sarcasm.


Offline sarcasm_made_Easy

  • Compsognathus
  • *****
  • Posts: 10320
  • Liked: 15
Re: Worst directors actually employed
« Reply #44 on: February 06, 2007, 06:04:13 PM »
hey andrew what did you think of my understanding of fountian.  its buried in one of the spoiler tags.