Faux Motivation

[RobtheBarbärian]

You make a broad slur against men and you think that the fact that it offends someone proves your point? Yeesh. You're a pyscho... did you get dumped recently?

[MzStilletto]

You make a broad slur against men and you think that the fact that it offends someone proves your point? Yeesh. You're a pyscho... did you get dumped recently?

No.  Did you?

Or maybe you're just too troll-like to be with someone and are single.

See boys, I can take personal shots too.  Not very lady like, is it?  Tut-tut.

Believe it or not, some of us females do not base our self worth on whether or not we have a man.  I do have one, and thank goodness he is a lot more respectful than some of the people I've met on this board.

[Tripe H. Redux]

I think I can use this on other occasions but here's a great place to debut it:

[RVR II]

Anybody has the right to voice their concerns, and can 'change the channel' if they don't like what they read or see!!

Freedom of speech and consideration for others are not mutually exclusive, ya know.

Agreed..
But when I, or any other forum member post something or an image and it's taken out of context, a 'Violent Spew of Directed Anger' as a Response directed at that 1 or any 1 forum member is Not Appropriate in my book!
That's All I'm trying to get across..

Out of context?  RVR, you seem to me to be WAY too shallow and simple to post something that isn't painfully obviously blatant in its meaning.  Its clear to me that you have a very low opinion of women in general (whether you realize it or not) and I therefore have a very low opinion of you.  Why you should give a rodent's posterior about that I have yet to fathom.

And I highly doubt that my response could be considered a "violent spew of directed anger".  If I wanted to be violent, I would simply threaten violent action.  You know, like most MEN would do.  Just because a woman says something or expresses an opinion in a way that isn't socially acceptable for women to do (i.e. sweety, giggly, or not at all) doesn't mean she's being violent, or even out of line.

And that's all I'M trying to get across.  I don't expect to make you change your mind, as I have neither the time nor the inclination to find a way to get you to un-learn everything you have learned about your attitude towards the female gender and then re-educate you.  If you have any kind of passion for self-improvement (like Homer) then you may seek to do this on your own accord.

OK.. Obviously Your 'Ideology' of the world is Far Different than mine..

1st Off: I'M NOT A SEXIST!!! I'm Happily Married and Treat my wife with The UTMOST RESPECT as Such!! Your Classifying Me as a 'Sexist' is WRONG & Out Of Line!! Your 'Twisted' views of what I Post are Nowhere Close to what You're Classifying them as, And Noone Else Seems to view them as Critically as You Do!!!

2nd: You seem to continue to have this View that Men think of women as some sort of subservient beings on this forum.. Again: You're Completely WRONG!! I don't see other women complaining that men here are purposely degrading women, cause It's Not Happening Here!! ONLY IN YOUR VIEWS!!

3rd: I am actually Highly Intelligent Despite your 'misguided hopes' that I'm Not.. From my Nuclear Submarine background, to holding 2 College Degrees, and being a Self-Employed business owner working Directly with the Internal Revenue Service, I'm sorry to Disappoint you But I'm Far from it!!

So, I know your brand of humor (what ever that may be cause I don't see it) is Far from what I find Humorous and I won't waist time debating it, but My Image Posts are Meant to be FUNNY, and Are Not Derogatory Towards Women!!

[RobtheBarbärian]

No.  Did you?

Or maybe you're just too troll-like to be with someone and are single.

See boys, I can take personal shots too.  Not very lady like, is it?  Tut-tut.

Believe it or not, some of us females do not base our self worth on whether or not we have a man.  I do have one, and thank goodness he is a lot more respectful than some of the people I've met on this board.

So real women can't tell when someone is just taunting them.  I'm learning so much...

[Tripe H. Redux]

Have to say somebody with a cartoon kiddie poor avatar really should be careful about calling others trolls.

Torgos or Bathtub could you have a word? It's googoogeiger all over again.

[jewishcarpenter]

Wow, so many of you guys are disappointing me in this thread.

[RVR II]

Wow, so many of you guys are disappointing me in this thread.

I think we need some 'Faux Inspiration' for help!

[MzStilletto]

Anybody has the right to voice their concerns, and can 'change the channel' if they don't like what they read or see!!

Freedom of speech and consideration for others are not mutually exclusive, ya know.

Agreed..
But when I, or any other forum member post something or an image and it's taken out of context, a 'Violent Spew of Directed Anger' as a Response directed at that 1 or any 1 forum member is Not Appropriate in my book!
That's All I'm trying to get across..

Out of context?  RVR, you seem to me to be WAY too shallow and simple to post something that isn't painfully obviously blatant in its meaning.  Its clear to me that you have a very low opinion of women in general (whether you realize it or not) and I therefore have a very low opinion of you.  Why you should give a rodent's posterior about that I have yet to fathom.

And I highly doubt that my response could be considered a "violent spew of directed anger".  If I wanted to be violent, I would simply threaten violent action.  You know, like most MEN would do.  Just because a woman says something or expresses an opinion in a way that isn't socially acceptable for women to do (i.e. sweety, giggly, or not at all) doesn't mean she's being violent, or even out of line.

And that's all I'M trying to get across.  I don't expect to make you change your mind, as I have neither the time nor the inclination to find a way to get you to un-learn everything you have learned about your attitude towards the female gender and then re-educate you.  If you have any kind of passion for self-improvement (like Homer) then you may seek to do this on your own accord.

OK.. Obviously Your 'Ideology' of the world is Far Different than mine..

1st Off: I'M NOT A SEXIST!!! I'm Happily Married and Treat my wife with The UTMOST RESPECT as Such!! Your Classifying Me as a 'Sexist' is WRONG & Out Of Line!! Your 'Twisted' views of what I Post are Nowhere Close to what You're Classifying them as, And Noone Else Seems to view them as Critically as You Do!!!

2nd: You seem to continue to have this View that Men think of women as some sort of subservient beings on this forum.. Again: You're Completely WRONG!! I don't see other women complaining that men here are purposely degrading women, cause It's Not Happening Here!! ONLY IN YOUR VIEWS!!

3rd: I am actually Highly Intelligent Despite your 'misguided hopes' that I'm Not.. From my Nuclear Submarine background, to holding 2 College Degrees, and being a Self-Employed business owner working Directly with the Internal Revenue Service, I'm sorry to Disappoint you But I'm Far from it!!

So, I know your brand of humor (what ever that may be cause I don't see it) is Far from what I find Humorous and I won't waist time debating it, but My Image Posts are Meant to be FUNNY, and Are Not Derogatory Towards Women!!

#1:  You clearly are sexist.  Just because you managed to get someone to marry you doesn't mean you aren't.  And just because no one else has voiced a problem with your posts doesn't mean they don't have a problem with them.

#2:  Having you "shout" that I AM WRONG sort of proves my point a little more.  Once again, just because other women aren't complaining doesn't mean they don't feel the same way I do.  And yes, in my view, it is happening here.

#3:  I do not recall calling you unintelligent.  I called you shallow and simple, and those are not the same thing.  Nor do I recall saying anything that would indicate I have "misguided hopes" of such.

I do understand that your posts are meant to be funny, but I am telling you that most of them are not.  Not even the ones that aren't sexist.  

50 years ago people could freely make nigger and chink jokes, and if someone got offended, the jokers would likely just roll their eyes, tell them they are overreacting and that it's "all in good fun" and the offended would continue to be put down for voicing an opinion.  Those views changed over time because enough people finally spoke out.  

And please RVR, try not to burst a vessel whilst typing in caps with your many, many, many exclamation points.

[MzStilletto]

Have to say somebody with a cartoon kiddie poor avatar really should be careful about calling others trolls.

Torgos or Bathtub could you have a word? It's googoogeiger all over again.

LOL!  Now you're attacking my avatar?  Seriuosly?

Wow. 

I made it when everyone else was into those South Park character creator thingies.  I have one just like most everyone else does.  Hell, even Torgos had one.  So don't be ridiculous.

[Tripe H. Redux]

Again I say:



And that was just a minor issue, the fact that you are a colossal prig is the most pertinent one

[MzStilletto]

Again I say:



And that was just a minor issue, the fact that you are a colossal prig is the most pertinent one

I realize you're just trying to bait me, but honestly, why would I care about what someone who I think is a troll thinks of me?
Feel free to flip that one around and use it to your benefit as well.

[RVR II]

 
Well.. Obviously, You're a Racist Too!! That's Just Greeaatt...
Opinions are like A__Holes; everybody's Got One, But some need More Ointment than others..
From my interpretation of your use of Shallow & Simple seems to represent a Low Intelligence to me..

I think you've got some Serious issues, and arguing with you about your self-centered views is a waste of my time!

[Tripe H. Redux]

why would I care about what someone who I think is a troll thinks of me?

Hmm lets see I've how many posts? I've started a bunch of threads while you, dearheart, have spent the majority of your small number of posts pissing and moaning, which to an objective observer is more the profile of a troll hmmm?

[Minnesota]

*subscribes to thread*
(also, I 2nd what jewishcarpenter said)