Opium and the Kung Fu Master ( 1984 )The 80s was the "Just Say No" decade. And Shaw Brothers did their part with this anti- drug film. Well, more specifically an anti opium film. The central character is Leung Kwan, a real life master from the late 19th century who was a member of the Ten Tigers of Kwangtung. Leung was know to have been a habitual Opium user, and it is believed that was what contributed to his death in 1912.
In this film villains open an Opium den in Kwangtung which gradually ruins the lives of various characters. One of Leung's students has basically abandoned his family and spends all of his time and money at the Opium den. He returns home to discover his wife has poisoned the kids and hung herself. Blaming his addiction for causing the tragedy, he commits suicide himself. This in turn enrages Leung's #1 student, who decides to attempt to burn the opium den to the ground. During all of this Leung himself has gradually grown addicted to opium. Finding out his student is about to burn the den down, he rushes out of his house to stop him. Leung ends up in a duel with the film's villain. But since he is now an addict, he not only loses the duel, but is unable to prevent the villain from murdering his student. Can Leung kick his addiction so he can avenge his student and drive the villains out of town? Well, of course. It wouldn't be much of a movie if he didn't.
This was an oddly preachy film demonstrating all the various ways opium will either ruin or kill people, after which other characters practically break the fourth wall to say the same message again and again, that opium eventually leads to death. Aside from the heavy handed anti-opium message, it is an excellent martial arts movie with decent fights.
Vampirella ( 1998 )The Comic Code Authority had two goals. One was to create a regulatory commission run by the major comic book publishers instead of allowing the government to regulate content in comic books. The second, was so the comic book publishers could team up and take out EC Comics. During the 50s EC was the #1 comic book company, outselling DC, Dell, Archie and all the rest. EC was not invited to join the Comic Code Authority. And one of the new rules the Authority came up with banned all horror comics, which was ECs mainstay. Stores refused to sell comic books without the Comic Code Authority seal, which meant EC could no longer sell
Tails from the Crypt or any of their other best selling titles. But instead of going completely out of business, EC tried one last thing. They took their popular humor comic book
Mad and relaunched it as a black and white magazine. Since it qualified as an adult magazine and not a comic book targeted at children, stores and newsstands put
Mad Magazine on their shelves without the Comic Code Authority seal.
Cut to five years later. Another publisher launched Warren, perhaps best known for the long running magazine
Famous Monsters of Filmland. Warren decided to go after the fans of EC by publishing new horror comics, this time as black and white magazines. Among their titles we're
Creepy and
Eerie. They even signed Harvey Kurtzman, founder of the
Mad comic book, to write a new adult humor magazine called
Help!.
Vampirella was another one of Warren's adult horror magazines, but with a scantly clad female heroine who was a crime fighting vampire. Although the Warren publications gained cult followings, they never approach the success of
Mad Magazine.
Cut to the Late 90s. Someone acquired the movie rights to
Vampirella, but was unable to find a studio interested. With the rights about to expire, they were offered to Showtime. At the time the network had been working with film producer Roger Corman who was producing for them a series of cheap science fiction and horror films under the title
Roger Corman Presents.
Vampirella was added to the second season.
This being a Roger Corman film, I had low expectations. But it turned out to be pretty good. Of course, it could have been a lot better if not for Corman's notorious budget cutting tricks. The film opens thousands of years ago on the planet Drakulon, a planet of vampires that somehow has rivers flowing with blood, which keeps the Vampires from eating each other. Roger Daltrey plays the film's villain Vlad, who has been arrested for killing and drinking the blood of his fellow vampires. Under arrested and about to be sentenced to death by the high council, he is freed when his followers attack and kill the council members. They then steal a space ship and take it to Earth where as Dracula, Vlad begins turning humans into vampires. But back on Drakulon, the daughter of the head of the high council seeks revenge, and follows after Vlad in her own ship. There are mechanical problems, and she crash lands on Mars.
Thousands of years later astronauts discover the daughter's coffin on Mars and decide to bring it back to their ship. The daughter wakes up after a long sleep, and after hypnotizing the astronauts, has them bring her to Earth where as Vampirella she can hunt down and kill Vlad and his followers. Once on Earth she meets Adam Van Helsing, the latest in a long line of family members who have been hunting Dracula and his followers. Adam's father organized a covert law enforcement agency called PURGE, who use the latest high tech weapons to fight vampires. Vampirella falls in love with Adam, and almost immediately after he is kidnapped by Vlad's followers. Vampirella follows them back to their headquarters in Mexico, only to discover Vlad is about to launch a plan to use satellites to block out the sunlight and plunge the Earth into a permanent nighttime.
Everything About this film is cheap, including the special effects. Most notably, whenever Vampirella or Vlad turn into bats, where they are replaced with a cartoon bat that flies off screen faster than lightning. It is even worse than the vampire to bat transformations in the old Universal horror films. Roger Daltrey can't act, as usual. The title role was supposed to go to a busty actresses to match the body shape of Vampirella in the magazine. Instead the part went to the flat chested model Talisa Soto. At the time she was an up and coming super model. Corman had previously offered the role to Paula Abdul.
Despite all of this,
Vampirella ended up being a decent film. It was meant to act as the origin to what was to be a series of movies, and after the ending credits the following pops up on screen:
Vampirella will return in "Death's Dark Avenger"That never happened. After two seasons Showtime cancelled
Roger Corman Presents.
King Kung Fu ( 1976 )I bought this
King Kong parody a couple of years ago, watched it, and figured I would never have to watch it again. The DVD, released by a company called Mr FAT-W Video, was full screen, but I figured that an obscure film like that was mostly likely only available as a pan and scan. But then I found out it had previously been released widescreen by Image. The Image discs were OOP and I wasn't about to spend $75 for the movie. Then recently Amazon had a listing for the Image discs at $10. with only a couple left. However, the company listed on the DVD box is called Retromedia Ent. and neither the Image logo nor copyright nor any mention of Image Entertainment is anywhere on the box. Nor is Image mentioned on the disc. On eBay the dealers are listing the disc as Image/Retromedia. However, I can not find any evidence of Retromedia ever being a partner of or sub brand of Image. Making it harder, IMDb now expects you to pay a subscription fee to IMDb Pro if you want to look up studio or DVD releases. Which I am not going to do, so F&*k them. Further complicating things, Image no longer exists. It was bought and merged with Acorn to form the company RLJE ( or RJL Entertainment ), and nothing from Images past is listed on their website. The Retromedia website mentions nothing about Image, but does boast that it is the longest running independent DVD company, first releasing DVDs in 2001.
So could it be that Retromedia is rereleasing the Image disc, program, packaging and all? Two problems. One is that Retromedia is claiming a 2007 copyright on the packaging. The other is that the quality of the print used is way below Image's standards. I am now wondering if Image ever released this film at all. But just take a look and see what you think.....
Release from Mr. FAT-W Video

Release from Retromedia Ent.

As you can see, the Retromedia release does appear to have more picture information on both sides. However, there is some bad framing here where words on signs are cut off on the Retromedia print. On top of that, the Retromedia print appears to have been sourced from a VHS master instead of a scanned film print. The picture quality is nowhere near DVD quality, and I doubt Image would ever had released anything in such poor quality, even if no other prints were available. If I had to guess, it is not bad framing. Even the worst cinematographer in the world would not be so incompetent as to not get the entire banner which is meant to be a joke into frame. That would mean he pointed the camera at the actors without ever looking into the viewer to see if the camera was aligned properly. Most likely the text is cut off because it has been cropped off the print. Maybe this is the result of an incorrect aspect ratio on the DVD, such as further cropping so it fits a 16x9 sets. perfectly. Since the original film was an independent production, it is possible they went full mat for a direct to television release, or picked an aspect ratio closer to European which is very close to full screen. But based on the quality, I have my own theory. The original home video release was on VHS through King Gemini Corp and is listed as Full Screen. My guess is that the only print Retromedia had access to was either the King Gemini master, or simply a copy of one of the released tapes. Since the tapes were full screen, Retromedia had it cropped for widescreen. When next Mr FAT-W Video got the rights to the film, they decided to release it as full screen, then using the Retromedia DVD as their master print, both cropped off the sides and compressed the picture so it filled the entire screen. A dumb ass thing to do considering their release was in 2014, and by then digital televisions with 16x9 screens were replacing analog televisions with square screens.
So basically, there is no evidence that Image actually released this film other than Amazon claiming it is so, And Amazon has been known to have ben wrong listing companies on some of their DVDs. This is usually the case of a distributor lying about the company brand, and Amazon not bothering to check their stock once it came in. Also, I can not find any customer review complaining that this was not an Image release. So basically no one alerted Amazon of the problem. Heck, I haven't even bothered to tell Amazon. So basically no HD original aspect ratio copy of this film exists on home video as far as I know.
The film itself is as incompetent as a film can get, including bad actors with terribly timing. And not a single gag works. But for some reason is watchable. The plot involves a gorilla who has been trained in the martial arts. While at the Wichita Zoo, two reporters hatch a plan to free the gorilla from its cage, and even arrange for a girl named Ray Fay to stand next to the cage hoping that she will be abducted by the ape, so they will have a story to follow. King Kung Fu ends up escaping and rampaging through the city, ending up on the roof of it's tallest building, a Holiday Inn. Oh, and the chief of police is named Duke, and acts and dresses like John Wayne.
The film has two things going for it. One, the guy in the King Kung Fu costume seems to know Karate, and is able to pull off the occasional high kick or other MMA move. The other thing is that residents of Wichita enjoy this film as a time capsule of the city in the 70. Such as including the long gone Joyland Amusement Park and the long gone minor league base ball team, the Aeros.