Next time you should make it clearer that you are only here to make acerbic statements and not actually respond to any queries, I mean that is clear to everyone now after reading this thread and the other, but it would have saved everyone a lot of time.
sorry about this. i just had to post my feelings after he so casually shrugged his shoulders and called me "kid".
Again, you are confusing me with someone else. Do I look like a Right-wing fundamentalist? You are at war with someone else, not me.
i don't think i confused you with anyone. let me quote your own post back to you.
This is utterly hilarious. I make a comment on how I dislike Penn and Teller (the point of this thread) and I get lambasted for my beliefs. You know why I haven't read Deuteronomy and Leviticus and why I skip around with the Old Testament, because beyond the messages of David, Solomon, and the Prophets I feel that it is not essential to my Christian walk.
what you're saying is, only parts of the bible are relevant to your "christian walk." who are you to decide what's relevant? i understand your political affiliation as NOT a "right wing fundamentalist" but that was never your god's label, was it? that's a modern creation of society, aka "man". isn't it the belief of most-or-all christians that the bible is either the word OF god, infallible, or the inspired word of god? or all three? so how exactly do you justify "cherry picking" as bathtub put it, your own religious manual?
"oh, yeah, that part about loving they neighbor is great for what i believe in. but the part about killing kids and raping women, and god seeking justice. that can't possibly be true, since it doesn't make sense to MY OWN BELIEFS. i guess i'll ignore it.."
i've heard that all before, from every single religious apologetic. if one part of the bible is false then the whole thing must be, so anything i don't like i just won't accept personally. POOF! instant salvation!