General Discussion > Computers & Gadgets & Tech
the future of broadband Thread
Henry88:
--- Quote ---Recently, many U.S. Internet service providers have fallen in line with their international counterparts in capping monthly residential broadband usage. A new study by a Georgia Tech researcher, conducted during an internship at Microsoft Research, shows such pricing models trigger uneasy user experiences that could be mitigated by better tools to monitor data usage through their home networks.
Home users, the study found, typically manage their capped broadband access against three uncertainties -- invisible balances, mysterious processes and multiple users -- and these uncertainties have predictable impacts on household Internet use and can force difficult choices on users. Given the undeniable trend in both Internet norms (such as cloud-based applications) and home-entertainment delivery toward greater broadband requirements, the study seeks to create awareness and empathy among designers and researchers about the experience of Internet use under bandwidth caps.
Marshini Chetty, a postdoctoral researcher in Georgia Tech's School of Interactive Computing, interviewed 12 households in South Africa, a country in which broadband caps were universal until February 2010. Typically, the caps set by South African ISPs are severe with some plans only offering 1 GB of data per month. At the time of the study, the caps ranged up to 9GB of data, far lower than the 150GB-250GB caps set by U.S. providers.
What Chetty and her collaborators found were coping mechanisms built into South Africans' daily lives in order to manage their online activities under the caps. For example, some would routinely "top up" their accounts (pay additional fees for incremental cap increases), while others would visit family members to use their Internet accounts, or switch from desktop connectivity to smartphones. And with few (if any) ways for customers to monitor Internet usage throughout the month, their access often would be cut off in the middle of performing an online activity.
"People's behavior does change when limits are placed on Internet access -- just like we've seen happen in the smartphone market -- and many complain about usage-based billing, but no one has really studied the effects it has on consumer activity," said Chetty, who earned her Ph.D. in computer science from Georgia Tech in 2011. "We would also hear about people 'saving' bandwidth all month and then binge downloading toward the end of their billing period."
"Mysterious processes" refers to customers' inability to determine which applications are eating up their bandwidth, ranging from being unaware that streaming video or downloading songs consumes much more data than normal web browsing, to not knowing that many background applications (such as automatic software updates) count against the monthly cap.
"We were surprised to learn that many of the households we studied chose not to perform regular software updates in order to manage their cap," Chetty said. "This activity can be benign for some applications, inadvisable for others and downright dangerous in certain cases. For example, not installing security patches on your system can leave you vulnerable to viruses and other sorts of cyber attacks." Chetty suggested that the frequency of such risky behaviors among the broader population of metered/capped Internet users should be assessed via follow-up scientifically representative surveys.
Finally, in households with multiple Internet users, it can be difficult for the heads of the household to manage overall activity when they are not fully aware of each member's Internet use. As with other consumable resources in a household, from milk to hot water, the apportionment of "fair" amounts of bandwidth reflects family practices and requires a fair bit of nuance, varying by family style and composition.
"As ISPs move more toward usage-based pricing, we need to keep in mind the reactive behaviors that consumers adopt and the consequences of those behaviors. Because when you have broadband caps, you will use the Internet differently," Chetty said. "This study was performed in South Africa, and although the caps are higher in the United States, there are still instances where people are hitting them. So if you're going to have caps, you should empathize with your users and offer ways for customers to see how their data are being used and who is using them." More tools are becoming available, from ISPs, within operating systems and from third parties; but this is one of the first academic studies that systematically reveals why there is a demand for such tools, and why they are important to users.
The study's findings are summarized in the paper, "'You're Capped!' Understanding the Effects of Bandwidth Caps on Broadband Use in the Home," which Chetty will present on May 10 at the 2012 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2012), being held May 5-10 in Austin, Texas. Chetty's coauthors include Beki Grinter, professor in the Georgia Tech School of Interactive Computing, and Richard Banks, A.J. Bernheim Brush and Jonathan Donner from Microsoft Research. The paper is one of nine Georgia Tech entries in the main program of CHI 2012.
--- End quote ---
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/05/120507113748.htm
gavind:
--- Quote from: Henry88 on June 13, 2012, 09:00:44 PM ---
--- Quote ---Recently, many U.S. Internet service providers have fallen in line with their international counterparts in capping monthly residential broadband usage. A new study by a Georgia Tech researcher, conducted during an internship at Microsoft Research, shows such pricing models trigger uneasy user experiences that could be mitigated by better tools to monitor data usage through their home networks.
Home users, the study found, typically manage their capped broadband access against three uncertainties -- invisible balances, mysterious processes and multiple users -- and these uncertainties have predictable impacts on household Internet use and can force difficult choices on users. Given the undeniable trend in both Internet norms (such as cloud-based applications) and home-entertainment delivery toward greater broadband requirements, the study seeks to create awareness and empathy among designers and researchers about the experience of Internet use under bandwidth caps.
Marshini Chetty, a postdoctoral researcher in Georgia Tech's School of Interactive Computing, interviewed 12 households in South Africa, a country in which broadband caps were universal until February 2010. Typically, the caps set by South African ISPs are severe with some plans only offering 1 GB of data per month. At the time of the study, the caps ranged up to 9GB of data, far lower than the 150GB-250GB caps set by U.S. providers.
What Chetty and her collaborators found were coping mechanisms built into South Africans' daily lives in order to manage their online activities under the caps. For example, some would routinely "top up" their accounts (pay additional fees for incremental cap increases), while others would visit family members to use their Internet accounts, or switch from desktop connectivity to smartphones. And with few (if any) ways for customers to monitor Internet usage throughout the month, their access often would be cut off in the middle of performing an online activity.
"People's behavior does change when limits are placed on Internet access -- just like we've seen happen in the smartphone market -- and many complain about usage-based billing, but no one has really studied the effects it has on consumer activity," said Chetty, who earned her Ph.D. in computer science from Georgia Tech in 2011. "We would also hear about people 'saving' bandwidth all month and then binge downloading toward the end of their billing period."
"Mysterious processes" refers to customers' inability to determine which applications are eating up their bandwidth, ranging from being unaware that streaming video or downloading songs consumes much more data than normal web browsing, to not knowing that many background applications (such as automatic software updates) count against the monthly cap.
"We were surprised to learn that many of the households we studied chose not to perform regular software updates in order to manage their cap," Chetty said. "This activity can be benign for some applications, inadvisable for others and downright dangerous in certain cases. For example, not installing security patches on your system can leave you vulnerable to viruses and other sorts of cyber attacks." Chetty suggested that the frequency of such risky behaviors among the broader population of metered/capped Internet users should be assessed via follow-up scientifically representative surveys.
Finally, in households with multiple Internet users, it can be difficult for the heads of the household to manage overall activity when they are not fully aware of each member's Internet use. As with other consumable resources in a household, from milk to hot water, the apportionment of "fair" amounts of bandwidth reflects family practices and requires a fair bit of nuance, varying by family style and composition.
"As ISPs move more toward usage-based pricing, we need to keep in mind the reactive behaviors that consumers adopt and the consequences of those behaviors. Because when you have broadband caps, you will use the Internet differently," Chetty said. "This study was performed in South Africa, and although the caps are higher in the United States, there are still instances where people are hitting them. So if you're going to have caps, you should empathize with your users and offer ways for customers to see how their data are being used and who is using them." More tools are becoming available, from ISPs, within operating systems and from third parties; but this is one of the first academic studies that systematically reveals why there is a demand for such tools, and why they are important to users.
The study's findings are summarized in the paper, "'You're Capped!' Understanding the Effects of Bandwidth Caps on Broadband Use in the Home," which Chetty will present on May 10 at the 2012 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2012), being held May 5-10 in Austin, Texas. Chetty's coauthors include Beki Grinter, professor in the Georgia Tech School of Interactive Computing, and Richard Banks, A.J. Bernheim Brush and Jonathan Donner from Microsoft Research. The paper is one of nine Georgia Tech entries in the main program of CHI 2012.
--- End quote ---
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/05/120507113748.htm
--- End quote ---
" Bandwidth Caps Create User Uncertainty" This is broadband gone 100 times difficult. Movies will be so much hard to download :(
Henry88:
--- Quote ---Technology permeates the modern lifestyle, but large swaths of people are missing out on the revolution, even in developed nations like the U.S.
Google's executive chairman Eric Schmidt pointed out over two-thirds of the world's population do not have Internet access, building on an earlier comment he made at the Mobile World Congress earlier this year. At a conference in Israel, Schmidt explored the limits to the current technological landscape.
"The World Wide Web has yet to live up to its name," Schmidt said, calling for outreach to communities lacking access to the Internet.
Who are these people Schmidt worries will be left behind? In the U.S., the southern states of Mississippi, Alabama, Arkansas and Tennessee have broadband subscription rates far lower than the rest of the country, pointing to a lack of Internet access. In rural areas, 1 in 10 rural households have no broadband available, meaning the best they could get is archaic and unreliable dial-up Internet.
The lagging rates of access correlate to low median incomes, suggesting a relationship between low-income households and limited Internet connections. This also means school districts lower on the socio-economic ladder suffer from poor access as well.
The Hechinger Report, which focuses on education news, highlighted how some rural U.S. schools are coping with the Internet deficiency, trying to wire their facilities so students can learn about vital technologies on campus despite their potential lack of access at home.
While some schools are so tuned in to technology they are pushing the limits by experimenting with high-tech tracking systems, others struggle to find funds for basic computers, a problem the tech industry is stepping up to discuss.
For example, Apple's initiative to get iPads into schools may help level the growing divide. The Cupertino company partnered with educational textbook purveyor McGraw Hill to lower the prices of school materials, which may open more doors for rural schools strapped for cash and looking for more affordable tech solutions.
Still, even with Apple's plans to digitize education for the masses and President Obama's educational tech initiative pushing digital textbooks, there's a lot of work to do to bring large pockets of the U.S. up to speed.
The U.S. is ranked 12th for Internet access, possibly because of the lack of competition -- 96 percent of Americans have access to two or less providers. Moreover, high-speed Internet access is more expensive than it needs to be, as Americans pay twice as much per megabyte than places like South Korea and Japan, which have made more concerted efforts to get their countries up to speed.
Globally, many developing countries have even more extreme Internet limits. USAID described the situation in Central America and the Caribbean, where access hovers at 30 percent. Obama announced a program called Broadband of the Partnership Americas, which focuses on improving Internet capabilities in Latin America, but the situation there is indicative of access levels across the globe in rural, developing nations.
In both developing nations and developed nations like the U.S. with connectivity hurdles, this lack of access continues to bog down populations who need technology to bolster their economies and educational opportunities.
Schmidt pointed out a very real problem, and the next step is beefing up Internet connectivity both domestically and globally, which will require serious efforts from governments, corporations and citizens alike. Governments may choose to introduce initiatives, but they will need the cooperation of broadband distributors, especially in the U.S., where prices are far above what they need to be.
Schmidt noted that the Internet will not magically fix the socioeconomic injustice, but widespread access is necessary to level the playing field. Internet access may not be synonymous with opportunity, but it is an integral part of the modern economy, and people without it are likely to stay at a disadvantage.
Unless changes are made, this problem may exacerbate the widening income gap in the U.S. by perpetuating poverty, since limited Internet access translates into limited educational and employment opportunities.
--- End quote ---
http://www.mobiledia.com/news/154529.html
Smith Dr John Smith:
--- Quote from: Henry88 on June 22, 2012, 07:10:27 PM ---
--- Quote ---Technology permeates the modern lifestyle, but large swaths of people are missing out on the revolution, even in developed nations like the U.S.
Google's executive chairman Eric Schmidt pointed out over two-thirds of the world's population do not have Internet access, building on an earlier comment he made at the Mobile World Congress earlier this year. At a conference in Israel, Schmidt explored the limits to the current technological landscape.
"The World Wide Web has yet to live up to its name," Schmidt said, calling for outreach to communities lacking access to the Internet.
Who are these people Schmidt worries will be left behind? In the U.S., the southern states of Mississippi, Alabama, Arkansas and Tennessee have broadband subscription rates far lower than the rest of the country, pointing to a lack of Internet access. In rural areas, 1 in 10 rural households have no broadband available, meaning the best they could get is archaic and unreliable dial-up Internet.
The lagging rates of access correlate to low median incomes, suggesting a relationship between low-income households and limited Internet connections. This also means school districts lower on the socio-economic ladder suffer from poor access as well.
The Hechinger Report, which focuses on education news, highlighted how some rural U.S. schools are coping with the Internet deficiency, trying to wire their facilities so students can learn about vital technologies on campus despite their potential lack of access at home.
While some schools are so tuned in to technology they are pushing the limits by experimenting with high-tech tracking systems, others struggle to find funds for basic computers, a problem the tech industry is stepping up to discuss.
For example, Apple's initiative to get iPads into schools may help level the growing divide. The Cupertino company partnered with educational textbook purveyor McGraw Hill to lower the prices of school materials, which may open more doors for rural schools strapped for cash and looking for more affordable tech solutions.
Still, even with Apple's plans to digitize education for the masses and President Obama's educational tech initiative pushing digital textbooks, there's a lot of work to do to bring large pockets of the U.S. up to speed.
The U.S. is ranked 12th for Internet access, possibly because of the lack of competition -- 96 percent of Americans have access to two or less providers. Moreover, high-speed Internet access is more expensive than it needs to be, as Americans pay twice as much per megabyte than places like South Korea and Japan, which have made more concerted efforts to get their countries up to speed.
Globally, many developing countries have even more extreme Internet limits. USAID described the situation in Central America and the Caribbean, where access hovers at 30 percent. Obama announced a program called Broadband of the Partnership Americas, which focuses on improving Internet capabilities in Latin America, but the situation there is indicative of access levels across the globe in rural, developing nations.
In both developing nations and developed nations like the U.S. with connectivity hurdles, this lack of access continues to bog down populations who need technology to bolster their economies and educational opportunities.
Schmidt pointed out a very real problem, and the next step is beefing up Internet connectivity both domestically and globally, which will require serious efforts from governments, corporations and citizens alike. Governments may choose to introduce initiatives, but they will need the cooperation of broadband distributors, especially in the U.S., where prices are far above what they need to be.
Schmidt noted that the Internet will not magically fix the socioeconomic injustice, but widespread access is necessary to level the playing field. Internet access may not be synonymous with opportunity, but it is an integral part of the modern economy, and people without it are likely to stay at a disadvantage.
Unless changes are made, this problem may exacerbate the widening income gap in the U.S. by perpetuating poverty, since limited Internet access translates into limited educational and employment opportunities.
--- End quote ---
http://www.mobiledia.com/news/154529.html
--- End quote ---
So after ten years some one finally noticed that people like me can't get highspeed . All I can say is that it is about time.
Henry88:
this is so neat
http://www.carlsonwireless.com/products/ruralconnect-ip.html
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version