login

Author Topic: Star Trek 2009 sucks!  (Read 22282 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Doctor Who?

  • Guest
Star Trek 2009 sucks!
« on: October 12, 2011, 10:07:05 PM »
It seems like some trekers hate the new Star Trek movie so much that they can't resit slamming it,even if it is not being talked about.

So here is a whole thread where people can talk about how much it sucked and how stupid J.J.Abrans is.

Have fun.


Russell

  • Guest
Re: Star Trek 2009 sucks!
« Reply #1 on: October 12, 2011, 10:16:23 PM »
Oh lord. Now I'm gonna be feeding the trolls :(


Offline Sideswipe

  • Compsognathus
  • *****
  • Posts: 10563
  • Liked: 2052
  • Look at me!!
Re: Star Trek 2009 sucks!
« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2011, 10:29:06 PM »
they completely missed the point of Kirk taking the Kobyashi Maru test.

I was bieng threated with death by wolf raping before it was cool!.


Offline D.B. Barnes

  • Grendel's Mom
  • ***
  • Posts: 9952
  • Liked: 6621
  • "AMIRITE?!?"
Re: Star Trek 2009 sucks!
« Reply #3 on: October 12, 2011, 10:29:21 PM »
VIVA IL ESORDIO DEL DIABETE ADULTO DUCE!!!


Russell

  • Guest
Re: Star Trek 2009 sucks!
« Reply #4 on: October 12, 2011, 10:34:44 PM »
they completely missed the point of Kirk taking the Kobyashi Maru test.
If anybody missed the point, it was the audience, the meaning of the test is subjective,
and while the meaning in Wrath of Khan is the definitive one, our characters may
yet lack the maturity to recognize the point of the test.


Offline doggans

  • The FBI Pays Me to Surf
  • *
  • Posts: 2283
  • Liked: 453
  • w00tstock Photobomb is TEARING Zombie Wiseau APAHT
    • doggans.com
Re: Star Trek 2009 sucks!
« Reply #5 on: October 13, 2011, 03:25:49 AM »
I guess I need to start my own thread for "Star Trek 2009 was a whole lot of fun at the time but I've never really been in the mood to watch it again!"


Offline RVR II

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 54021
  • Liked: 3699
  • There can be Only 1...
    • RVR II's YouTube Channel
Re: Star Trek 2009 sucks!
« Reply #6 on: October 13, 2011, 04:28:23 AM »
I agree This movie sucked ass!  :o


Offline bta

  • Not Hurt By Pain
  • ******
  • Posts: 1210
  • Liked: 739
  • Sort this; deliver that; I'll make 'em all pay.
Re: Star Trek 2009 sucks!
« Reply #7 on: October 13, 2011, 05:10:28 AM »
Shouldn't this be in "movies", not "television"?   Fail.
\()/ 3~ \()/


Offline RVR II

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 54021
  • Liked: 3699
  • There can be Only 1...
    • RVR II's YouTube Channel
Re: Star Trek 2009 sucks!
« Reply #8 on: October 13, 2011, 05:23:48 AM »
Since Doc started this thread, it's expected to be in the wrong catagory :D


anais.jude

  • Guest
Re: Star Trek 2009 sucks!
« Reply #9 on: October 13, 2011, 07:39:21 AM »
 My thread will be titled: Star Trek 2009 was entertaining but would have been much better if Chris Pine was shirtless the entire movie


Russell

  • Guest
Re: Star Trek 2009 sucks!
« Reply #10 on: October 13, 2011, 08:48:13 AM »
My thread will be titled: Star Trek 2009 was entertaining but would have been much better if Chris Pine was shirtless the entire movie
Hey I'm all for equal opportunity exploitation. But to tell the truth, none of the women in this iteration of Star
Trek really did much for me.


anais.jude

  • Guest
Re: Star Trek 2009 sucks!
« Reply #11 on: October 13, 2011, 08:58:35 AM »
My thread will be titled: Star Trek 2009 was entertaining but would have been much better if Chris Pine was shirtless the entire movie
Hey I'm all for equal opportunity exploitation. But to tell the truth, none of the women in this iteration of Star
Trek really did much for me.


None of the one you mean? Also, Chris Pine should have been pantless too. It should be called Star Trek: Kirk in Boxers


Russell

  • Guest
Re: Star Trek 2009 sucks!
« Reply #12 on: October 13, 2011, 09:01:26 AM »
None of the one you mean? Also, Chris Pine should have been pantless too. It should be called Star Trek: Kirk in Boxers
I'm sure Chris Pine will be more than happy to run around the next film in his boxers just for
you. ;)


Offline RoninFox

  • Gryffindork
  • ******
  • Posts: 14018
  • Liked: 2380
    • Ronin Fox Trax
Re: Star Trek 2009 sucks!
« Reply #13 on: October 13, 2011, 09:45:01 AM »
My thread will be titled: Star Trek 2009 was entertaining but would have been much better if Chris Pine was shirtless the entire movie
Hey I'm all for equal opportunity exploitation. But to tell the truth, none of the women in this iteration of Star
Trek really did much for me.


None of the one you mean? Also, Chris Pine should have been pantless too. It should be called Star Trek: Kirk in Boxers

Be fair, there was also green girl.  Small part, but it came complete with boobies.
RoninFoxTrax Presents The Thing

gum.co/RFTthing


Offline D.B. Barnes

  • Grendel's Mom
  • ***
  • Posts: 9952
  • Liked: 6621
  • "AMIRITE?!?"
Re: Star Trek 2009 sucks!
« Reply #14 on: October 13, 2011, 10:01:38 AM »
My thread will be titled: Star Trek 2009 was entertaining but would have been much better if Chris Pine was shirtless the entire movie
Hey I'm all for equal opportunity exploitation. But to tell the truth, none of the women in this iteration of Star
Trek really did much for me.


None of the one you mean? Also, Chris Pine should have been pantless too. It should be called Star Trek: Kirk in Boxers

Be fair, there was also green girl.  Small part, but it came complete with boobies.

The green chick was hot. Hot, but green. And I think Zoe Saldana looked fantastic in this movie.
VIVA IL ESORDIO DEL DIABETE ADULTO DUCE!!!