Marvel's up to SOMETHING with Blade: http://www.avclub.com/article/marvels-dusting-blade-hunt-more-vampires-not-ones--243944I'm glad it's not a crossover with Underworld. Those movies not only weren't very good, but their world isn't very interesting.
Marvel's up to SOMETHING with Blade: http://www.avclub.com/article/marvels-dusting-blade-hunt-more-vampires-not-ones--243944I'm glad it's not a crossover with Underworld. Those movies not only weren't very good, but their world isn't very interesting.
I do wish Wesley Snipes could play the role at least once more. The guy is still in great shape, and it's a shame for him to go out with the disappointing Blade 3.
http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/C6VgotgUfyA
http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/C6VgotgUfyA
no mary-kate and ashley reference? :'(
It is clear that Doctor Strange doesn't take shit from anyone!:clap: :clap: :clap:
(https://media.giphy.com/media/q9cd1fap1IqNG/giphy.gif)
It is clear that Doctor Strange doesn't take shit from anyone!:clap: :clap: :clap:Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Is that from an SNL sketch or something?
Film Review: ‘Doctor Strange’ (http://variety.com/2016/film/reviews/doctor-strange-review-marvel-studios-1201895862/)
...
Cut from the same mold as playboys Tony Stark (Iron Man) and Bruce Wayne (Batman), Strange easily might have become world’s most insufferable superhero. But instead, it’s the very fact of this deeply insecure and wildly overcompensating character’s determination to prove himself — coupled with the setback by which texting while driving cripples his hands and very nearly derails him of that ambition — that makes “Doctor Strange” Marvel’s most satisfying entry since “Spider-Man 2,” and a throwback to M. Night Shyamalan’s soul-searching identity-crisis epic “Unbreakable,” which remains the gold standard for thinking people’s superhero movies.
....
M. Night Shyamalan’s soul-searching identity-crisis epic “Unbreakable,” which remains the gold standard forFixed it for you.thinkinginsomniac people’s superhero movies.
QuoteM. Night Shyamalan’s soul-searching identity-crisis epic “Unbreakable,” which remains the gold standard forFixed it for you.thinkinginsomniac people’s superhero movies.
hmmmm risk the saturday crowds to see Strange or wait till sometime next week.
"Hearing that Charlie Cox told some fans at Alamo comic con today that Defenders starts filming on Monday." (https://twitter.com/manwithoutfear/status/792524793530560512)
Netflix’s arm of the MCU is building towards its own Avengers-style team-up, The Defenders, in 2017. In a departure from the norm, the season will run to only eight episodes rather than than the 13-strong runs of Jessica Jones, Daredevil and Luke Cage.
The first two episodes of The Defenders also have a director in place.
Rather bummed to read this. :(QuoteNetflix’s arm of the MCU is building towards its own Avengers-style team-up, The Defenders, in 2017. In a departure from the norm, the season will run to only eight episodes rather than than the 13-strong runs of Jessica Jones, Daredevil and Luke Cage.
From: http://www.empireonline.com/movies/news/netflix-defenders-will-run-eight-episodes/
The article does, however, apparently clearly contradict the 3rd hand account of it already starting filming:QuoteThe first two episodes of The Defenders also have a director in place.
Having "a director in place" is hardly "starting filming [today]".
Rather bummed to read this. :(QuoteNetflix’s arm of the MCU is building towards its own Avengers-style team-up, The Defenders, in 2017. In a departure from the norm, the season will run to only eight episodes rather than than the 13-strong runs of Jessica Jones, Daredevil and Luke Cage.
From: http://www.empireonline.com/movies/news/netflix-defenders-will-run-eight-episodes/
A shorter season that is as great as the others is fine - I'd rather they didn't pad it out to make 13 eps.
AND we're scheduled to get Iron Fist and The Punisher in 2017 as well, so that means they are upping the release schedule too.
(https://scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14962715_1534577009892199_8408131848595717482_n.jpg?oh=112649bc4f84f29a7ed53ffecf46dd24&oe=588A4DA5)If that is true, then yes, filming for Defenders has already started, just as Cox had said (3rd hand).
"Jessica Jones and Misty Knight on the set of THE DEFENDERS!" (https://www.facebook.com/MarvelCinematicUniverse/photos/a.255014641181782.86037.217181691631744/1534577009892199/?type=3&theater)
Well, on one hand it might not seem like enough time to develop them, but on the other hand, it's the equivalent runtime of four movies, so think of how much one can do with four movies.
I can't wait until there is at least one new MCU release a week! That's the world I want to live in.
I know Damage Control was a 'put pilot' so at very least we should see something.
The ABC Entertainment president said it would be part of the 2016-17 season, and I haven't heard anything different yet, so I assume it's still coming.
I wonder if the pilot for Most Wanted will ever see the light of day? An extra on an Agents of SHIELD set maybe?
I wonder if the pilot for Most Wanted will ever see the light of day? An extra on an Agents of SHIELD set maybe?
I hope so! I really wanted to see that show get picked up.
I wonder if the pilot for Most Wanted will ever see the light of day? An extra on an Agents of SHIELD set maybe?
I hope so! I really wanted to see that show get picked up.
Ditto. I am shocked they couldn't make it work. :/
I wonder if the pilot for Most Wanted will ever see the light of day? An extra on an Agents of SHIELD set maybe?
I hope so! I really wanted to see that show get picked up.
Ditto. I am shocked they couldn't make it work. :/
And to top that off, because they anticipated them being occupied with their own series, they burned bridges so thoroughly that the two couldn't come back to Agents of SHIELD without their leaving being trivialized. :(
And now we have a 4 week wait until the next SHIELD episode... :(
And now we have a 4 week wait until the next SHIELD episode... :(
I am actually grateful for this. Because the Darkholde is apparently a big deal in the Doctor Strange film, and what happens there will in turn affect Agents of SHIELD, it means that I have a few weeks in which I can hopefully build up the capacity to go and see Doctor Strange soon. [I've read that the 3D in it is far better than in Marvel's previous films, and that it adds a lot to the storytelling, so I plan to see it in IMAX 3D.]
And now we have a 4 week wait until the next SHIELD episode... :(
I am actually grateful for this. Because the Darkholde is apparently a big deal in the Doctor Strange film, and what happens there will in turn affect Agents of SHIELD, it means that I have a few weeks in which I can hopefully build up the capacity to go and see Doctor Strange soon. [I've read that the 3D in it is far better than in Marvel's previous films, and that it adds a lot to the storytelling, so I plan to see it in IMAX 3D.]
There is no mention of the Darkhold in Dr Strange.
As yet, I have seen no connection.
We are introducing a different supernatural element of the MCU, which happens to coincide with the release of Doctor Strange. So that’s what’s in the box — we can’t tell you, but something along those lines…I think you will be rewarded for [watching both Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. and Doctor Strange]. Some of the questions that we’re asking right at the top will be answered by the film and directly after the film. We’re starting to explore some of the same worlds.That does NOT say the box contents themselves cross with Doctor Strange, just that, "some of the questions that we’re asking right at the top will be answered by the film and directly after the film". So the ideas from SHIELD cross over and are "answered" in the film, more so than items themselves... or at least that's the way I'm now reading that.
LOS ANGELES — One of Marvel Entertainment’s most sprawling superhero mythologies, the Inhumans, is headed to the small screen in a major way.
But the Inhuman likes of Black Bolt, Crystal and Lockjaw, the teleporting dog, will first appear on big screens. As in the biggest.
Imax Corporation, Marvel and the ABC broadcast network announced a partnership on Monday to introduce — and finance — a lavish new television series that will focus on the Inhuman royal family. Under the agreement, a version that combines the initial two episodes of “Marvel’s The Inhumans,” shot entirely with Imax cameras, will play exclusively for two weeks next September on Imax screens worldwide.
Shortly thereafter, the episodes — edited to include additional scenes — will run on ABC, with new installments unspooling in typical prime-time fashion. (The look of the series on TV will be enhanced due to Imax technology.)
Wondering where that Inhumans movie has gone? Well.....QuoteLOS ANGELES — One of Marvel Entertainment’s most sprawling superhero mythologies, the Inhumans, is headed to the small screen in a major way.
But the Inhuman likes of Black Bolt, Crystal and Lockjaw, the teleporting dog, will first appear on big screens. As in the biggest.
Imax Corporation, Marvel and the ABC broadcast network announced a partnership on Monday to introduce — and finance — a lavish new television series that will focus on the Inhuman royal family. Under the agreement, a version that combines the initial two episodes of “Marvel’s The Inhumans,” shot entirely with Imax cameras, will play exclusively for two weeks next September on Imax screens worldwide.
Shortly thereafter, the episodes — edited to include additional scenes — will run on ABC, with new installments unspooling in typical prime-time fashion. (The look of the series on TV will be enhanced due to Imax technology.)
So TV episodes shown on IMAX and then back to TV.
Could be cool. I think the Inhumans lends itself better to a series rather than a single movie.
Marvel, ABC Set 'The Inhumans' TV Series (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/marvel-abc-set-inhumans-tv-series-947296)
The comic book studio — which previously abandoned plans for an Inhumans feature film — is now set to team with ABC Studios for an eight-episode live-action drama series set to premiere in the fall of 2017.
Few details are known about the project, including producers, cast and premise. The first two episodes of the series will debut in Imax theaters for two weeks in summer 2017 before moving to ABC in September where they will be followed by six subsequent new episodes.
Sources note that this is not the planned Inhumans feature film, which was initially set for July 2019 but pulled from the schedule. It is also not a spinoff of Marvel drama Agents of SHIELD, which has spent a good deal of time exploring a storyline about its Inhumans.
The Inhumans TV series will also be filmed completely with Imax cameras.If only the first two episodes will be shown in IMAX theaters, what's the point of the highly-expensive, difficult-to-maneuver cameras being used for all of it? It does, however, bode very well for how epic it may be, as IMAX isn't used for just talking heads.
If I had to guess, I'd say it's a promotional thing for IMAX.
This final line in the article confuses me a bit, however:QuoteThe Inhumans TV series will also be filmed completely with Imax cameras.If only the first two episodes will be shown in IMAX theaters, what's the point of the highly-expensive, difficult-to-maneuver cameras being used for all of it? It does, however, bode very well for how epic it may be, as IMAX isn't used for just talking heads.
If I had to guess, I'd say it's a promotional thing for IMAX.
This final line in the article confuses me a bit, however:QuoteThe Inhumans TV series will also be filmed completely with Imax cameras.If only the first two episodes will be shown in IMAX theaters, what's the point of the highly-expensive, difficult-to-maneuver cameras being used for all of it? It does, however, bode very well for how epic it may be, as IMAX isn't used for just talking heads.
If I had to guess, I'd say it's a promotional thing for IMAX.
If only the first two episodes will be shown in IMAX theaters, what's the point of the highly-expensive, difficult-to-maneuver cameras being used for all of it? It does, however, bode very well for how epic it may be, as IMAX isn't used for just talking heads.
Hey, I'd love more, more, more too! I can't wait until there is at least one new MCU release a week! That's the world I want to live in. But, in 2017 we're getting:
Iron Fist
Defenders
Punisher
Guardians of the Galaxy 2
Spider-Man
Thor Ragnarok
Agents of SHIELD
Damage Control
Cloak & Dagger
So, that's a pretty great slate for one year! :D
(I suspect you are probably right this will be the only Defenders series we get, but I think there's a possibility of a Heroes For Hire series)
(https://scontent-ort2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/15232103_1224278884277502_3990677309836146173_n.jpg?oh=96cbed3d226e3be2ad7047f5ed5a5099&oe=58B53E29)
Marvel and Netflix have officially confirmed that Marvel's Luke Cage will be getting a second season.
The announcement was made with a tweet that featured a video set to the tune of the Luke Cage opening theme, sent out with Cage's own mantra, "Always forward."
That makes Marvel three-for-three with second season renewals on Netflix. Marvel's Daredevil was renewed for a second season on Netflix and has since earned a third. Marvel's Jessica Jones has also been renewed for a second season.
No release date was named. There was simply a neon sign in the window of Pop's Barber Shop that reads "Season 2 Coming Soon." Luke Cage Season 2 will presumably follow Marvel's Iron Fist and the crossover Marvel's Defenders series, which will both land on Netflix in 2017.
Luke Cage star Mike Colter has teased that the series' second season may see Luke teaming up with soon-to-be fellow Defender Iron Fist, played in the Marvel Cinematic Universe by Game of Thrones alum Finn Jones. Both characters are best known for their time as the crime-fighting-for-profit duo called Heroes for Hire.
In addition to Iron Fist and Defenders, Marvel also has Daredevil Season 3, Jessica Jones Season 2 and the first season of Daredevil spin-off Marvel's Punisher queued up for Netflix, giving superhero streamers plenty to look forward to.
While at LA Comic-Con over the weekend, Mike Colter teased the Heroes for Hire team up to fans, saying, "Finn Jones I was just hanging out with him yesterday. So [I'm] going back to New York, start filming... We're getting ready to do 'Heroes for Hire' eventually, come on."
To be clear: Colter isn't saying they are filming Heroes for Hire right now; the shoot in NYC is for The Defenders. He's just (half-) jokingly alluding to him and Jones keeping in communication because eventually they are going to unite for HfH. So file this under actor hopes with a side of Marvel long-term planning, but not an official confirmation... yet.
(https://scontent-ort2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/15232103_1224278884277502_3990677309836146173_n.jpg?oh=96cbed3d226e3be2ad7047f5ed5a5099&oe=58B53E29)
I wonder if Damage Control is quietly disappearing?
Scott Buck, who is currently overseeing Netflix's Marvel show 'Iron Fist,' will do the same with the forthcoming ABC drama.
ABC and Marvel are turning to a familiar face to oversee The Inhumans.
Dexter grad Scott Buck has been tapped to serve as showrunner on ABC's straight-to-series Marvel and Imax drama, The Hollywood Reporter has learned.
The Inhumans, a race of superhumans with diverse and unique powers, were first introduced in Marvel Comics by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby in 1965. Since then, they have become among the most popular characters in the Marvel Universe. ABC's The Inhumans will explore the never-before-told epic adventure of Black Bolt and the royal family.
Buck will serve as showrunner on the drama series, with the first two episodes set to exclusively unspool in Imax theaters over a two-week period starting Labor Day Weekend 2017 before the drama debuts on ABC in September in a groundbreaking, first-of-its-kind collaboration that helps cut through the crowded fall landscape.
The Inhumans deal extends Marvel's relationship with Buck, who is currently serving as showrunner on the comic book powerhouse's Netflix drama Iron Fist. Iron Fist is Marvel and Netflix's fourth series, with the fifth — mini The Defenders — set to feature stars from the former as well as Daredevil, Jessica Jones and Luke Cage.
Iron Fist marks Buck's first post-Dexter gig. Buck served as showrunner for the final three seasons of Showtime's Michael C. Hall serial-killer-with-a-code drama after taking over for Clyde Phillips. Buck's credits also include Six Feet Under, Rome and Coach. He's repped by CAA.
Picked up straight to series Nov. 14, The Inhumans is ABC's latest Marvel collaboration. The live-action TV series is not taking the place of the planned feature film and is not a spinoff of ABC's Marvel drama Agents of SHIELD. This becomes ABC's third Marvel series, following SHIELD and the late and great Agent Carter. Inhumans is produced by Marvel, ABC Studios and Imax, with all episodes set to be filmed with Imax cameras.
I wonder if Damage Control is quietly disappearing?
Talk of it certainly seems to have vanished. After your question, I did a couple searches, and can't find any newer info since about January of this year. Possibly a crib death?
I wonder if Damage Control is quietly disappearing?
Talk of it certainly seems to have vanished. After your question, I did a couple searches, and can't find any newer info since about January of this year. Possibly a crib death?
I wasn't convinced it was going to be great anyway, but I'm always hungry for more MCU.
Level 1 (Pre-Conventional)
1. Obedience and punishment orientation
(How can I avoid punishment?)
2. Self-interest orientation
(What's in it for me?)
(Paying for a benefit)
Level 2 (Conventional)
3. Interpersonal accord and conformity
(Social norms)
(The good boy/girl attitude)
4. Authority and social-order maintaining orientation
(Law and order morality)
Level 3 (Post-Conventional)
5. Social contract orientation
6. Universal ethical principles
(Principled conscience)
Stage two (self-interest driven) expresses the "what's in it for me" position, in which right behavior is defined by whatever the individual believes to be in their best interest but understood in a narrow way which does not consider one's reputation or relationships to groups of people. Stage two reasoning shows a limited interest in the needs of others, but only to a point where it might further the individual's own interests. As a result, concern for others is not based on loyalty or intrinsic respect, but rather a "You scratch my back, and I'll scratch yours" mentality.[2] The lack of a societal perspective in the pre-conventional level is quite different from the social contract (stage five), as all actions at this stage have the purpose of serving the individual's own needs or interests. For the stage two theorist, the world's perspective is often seen as morally relative.
Stage four (authority and social order obedience driven), it is important to obey laws, dictums, and social conventions because of their importance in maintaining a functioning society. Moral reasoning in stage four is thus beyond the need for individual approval exhibited in stage three. A central ideal or ideals often prescribe what is right and wrong. If one person violates a law, perhaps everyone would—thus there is an obligation and a duty to uphold laws and rules. When someone does violate a law, it is morally wrong; culpability is thus a significant factor in this stage as it separates the bad domains from the good ones. Most active members of society remain at stage four, where morality is still predominantly dictated by an outside force.[2]
Stage six (universal ethical principles driven), moral reasoning is based on abstract reasoning using universal ethical principles. Laws are valid only insofar as they are grounded in justice, and a commitment to justice carries with it an obligation to disobey unjust laws. Legal rights are unnecessary, as social contracts are not essential for deontic moral action. Decisions are not reached hypothetically in a conditional way but rather categorically in an absolute way, as in the philosophy of Immanuel Kant.[18] This involves an individual imagining what they would do in another’s shoes, if they believed what that other person imagines to be true.[19] The resulting consensus is the action taken. In this way action is never a means but always an end in itself; the individual acts because it is right, and not because it avoids punishment, is in their best interest, expected, legal, or previously agreed upon. Although Kohlberg insisted that stage six exists, he found it difficult to identify individuals who consistently operated at that level.[15]
Marvel's Agents of SHIELD was all set to receive its own spinoff series in Most Wanted, but dreams were dashed when ABC didn't pick up the pilot. Now Agents of SHIELD is getting another spinoff project, this time in the form of a digital show called Slingshot.
The digital series will follow Elena "Yo-Yo" Rodriguez (played by Natalia Cordova-Buckley), who says of her role "There's a lot of me in Yo-Yo and a lot of Yo-Yo in me." The web series is actually a prequel to the start of season 4, showing how she comes to terms with her powers and giving it a bit of insight into the character's past.
Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.: Slingshot takes place shortly before the beginning of Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. Season 4. The digital series features Elena "Yo-Yo" Rodriguez, an Inhuman with the ability to move at super-speed. As a person with powers, she must sign the Sokovia Accords. However, the restrictions of the Accords are in direct conflict with a personal mission she's desperate to fulfill, one that will test her abilities and will include tense encounters with S.H.I.E.L.D. team members.
Slingshot launches on December 13, which is also when Marvel's Agents of SHIELD returns to ABC.
Wonder if Slingshot will be watchable outside of the US?From the Agents of SHIELD thread:
'Slingshot' micro-series up and running. Netflix style (all available at one). Starts here: http://abc.go.com/shows/marvels-agents-of-shield-slingshot/episode-guide/season-01/01-vendetta
Wonder if Slingshot will be watchable outside of the US?From the Agents of SHIELD thread:'Slingshot' micro-series up and running. Netflix style (all available at one). Starts here: http://abc.go.com/shows/marvels-agents-of-shield-slingshot/episode-guide/season-01/01-vendetta
So you'll have to let us know, EJG III, if it works for those outside the US. I hope so. While it wasn't mind-blowing, altogether it was a nice 'short solo episode' of AoS.
Wonder if Slingshot will be watchable outside of the US?From the Agents of SHIELD thread:'Slingshot' micro-series up and running. Netflix style (all available at one). Starts here: http://abc.go.com/shows/marvels-agents-of-shield-slingshot/episode-guide/season-01/01-vendettaSo you'll have to let us know, EJG III, if it works for those outside the US. I hope so. While it wasn't mind-blowing, altogether it was a nice 'short solo episode' of AoS.
not in the great white north, anyways:
(http://i.imgur.com/yiqR55s.png)
http://mcuexchange.com/speculation-damage-control-might-debut-in-spider-man-homecoming/
Peter Dinklage Eyed for a Key Role in ‘Avengers: Infinity War’ (EXCLUSIVE) (http://variety.com/2017/film/news/peter-dinklage-avengers-infinity-war-1201954237/)
Are Tyrion Lannister and Tony Stark about to cross paths?
Sources tell Variety that “Game of Thrones” star Peter Dinklage is in early talks for a key role in Marvel’s “Avengers: Infinity War.”
Marvel had no comment.
Production on the seventh season of “Game of Thrones” recently wrapped. Since the schedule for the show has moved from a summer shoot to a fall shoot, Dinklage’s schedule allowed him to board the latest “Avengers” pic which is expected to shoot sometime in early summer.
The plan is shoot the next two “Avengers” films (“Infinity War” and a yet untitled sequel) back-to-back. Sources indicate Dinklage is expected to appear in both.
Plot details are vague, other then the superhero team returning to face the Marvel mega-villain Thanos (voiced by Josh Brolin). Dinklage’s role is also unknown at this time.
Dinklage is one of the few new cast members to be added to the franchise. Previous stars like Robert Downey Jr. and Chris Evans are on board to return.
After directing the last two installments in the “Captain America” franchise, Anthony and Joe Russo now take over the reigns of directing the “Avengers” franchise, with the previous two pics directed by Joss Whedon. “Avengers: Infinity War” has a release date of May 4, 2018.
YES!!! That would be great.
I saw someone suggest he'd be a great MODOK, which is hard to deny...
The Watcher didn't really play any role in the Infinity ___ stories (e.g. Gauntlet, War, Crusade, etc.). While I'm sure Peter Dinklage could play an amazing Watcher, I certainly hope that the MCU isn't going to stray that far from the source material.That's true. If he's Pip then I got to wonder who's going to be Adam Warlock.
Don't expect it to match the comic in anything but name, or you are likely to be disappointed, going by all that has gone before.
I saw someone suggest he'd be a great MODOK, which is hard to deny...
http://www.avclub.com/article/freeforms-cloak-and-dagger-casts-its-cloak-and-dag-249382
Freeform’s Cloak And Dagger casts its Cloak and Dagger
http://www.avclub.com/article/freeforms-cloak-and-dagger-casts-its-cloak-and-dag-249382
Freeform’s Cloak And Dagger casts its Cloak and Dagger
A tad young looking (especially him), but given that it is being framed as a sort-of supernatural Dawson's Creek-ish 'teen love' thing, I guess that shouldn't be a surprise, so they'd have a few potential years of episodes before they looked way too old to pursue the roles any longer.
Meet the cast of Marvel's RUNAWAYS! (http://bit.ly/2k62IFv)
• Allegra Acosta (“100 Things to do Before High School,” “Just Add Magic”) as Molly Hernandez, the youngest and most innocent member of her friend group, is known for her peppy positivity and a deep yearning to belong.
• Gregg Sulkin (“Faking It,” “Don’t Hang Up,” “Anti Social”) as Chase Stein is a lacrosse-playing, high school heartthrob. While many write him off as a dumb jock, Chase exhibits flashes of untapped brilliance in engineering, not unlike his wildly successful father’s.
• Ariela Barer (“New Girl,” “One Day at a Time”) as Gert Yorkes is a purple-haired, bespectacled, contemporary riot grrrl. Never passing up a moment to stand on a soapbox, Gert sometimes wields her persona as a brash social justice warrior to mask her true feelings.
• Virginia Gardner (“Goat,” “Little Bitches”) as Karolina Dean, model-perfect exterior with a lot going on behind her professionally whitened smile, is burdened by the lofty expectations and responsibilities put upon her by her parents. Underneath her veneer of privilege and perfection, Karolina is experiencing a newfound eagerness to explore her identity and pursue her own desires.
• Lyrica Okano (“The Affair,” “Unforgettable”) Nico Minoru–tough, intelligent, and independent–embodies teenage angst. A budding “Wiccan,” Nico’s carefully crafted goth appearance isolates her from her peers and family, but maybe what she really needs is someone to talk to.
• Rhenzy Feliz (“Teen Wolf,” “Casual”) as Alex Wilder is a loud-and-proud nerd. Admittedly a bit of a loner, Alex spends much of his free-time playing video games, but deep down, what he wants most is to reunite his childhood group of friends.
Hulu has Ordered 'Runaways' as a "Straight-to-Series" Show (http://mcuexchange.com/hulu-ordered-runaways-straight-series-show/)
...press release from Freeform... states “Marvel Studios and ABC Signature are also in pre-production on straight-to-series “Marvel’s Runaways” for Hulu.” This is new information. Even yesterday, major trades like Deadline were calling this a pilot order. For those new to Hollywood lingo, a pilot is an order of a single episode which a studio then uses to determine if they want to order a whole or half season. A show might get a pilot and be deemed unworthy of a pick up (see Most Wanted). “Straight-to-series,” however, means that the network has picked up an entire season of a show even before seeing the pilot. These sorts of orders typically include financial penalties if a show is not eventually produced. This means that Hulu is almost certainly taking a whole season. (One caveat, Damage Control was also reported as straught-to-series, but that show appears to have died.)
Given the recent buzz around Runaways this isn’t a total surprise. Still, for MCU fans it’s nice to know that a full arc is coming and the show won’t be pulled midway. Streaming services tend toward the season at a time thinking, but Hulu is a little different. Since Hulu is owned by major networks, they tend to work like major networks, including their propensity to release a show a week at a time. The good news for Runaways seems to just keep coming.
I missed out on the Runaways. I picked up one for some crossover event a few years back and it seems to have that mix of melancholy and good writing that probably deserves all its accolades, but isn't my cup of tea comics-wise. I'll give the show a chance for sure, though.
Namor's a tough sell. He's not the most charming Marvel hero..
I think it's more to do with the tone difference in the approach by both companies. Marvel have turned some really average and unlikely properties into massive successes. DC have choked on some pretty easy sells.
Thinking about it, I'm kind of more interested in them trying these 'impossible' characters than a lot of the safe bets.
Actually, it'd be cool if Marvel committed to release one B-Lister a year. Maybe do them as February/March releases. Spend the rest of the year giving us the Hulks and Captain Marvels, but give us a Great Lakes Avengers or Howard the Duck (Lucas didn't ruin him forever! There's still a movie to be had there!) once a year.
ALSO I wonder if they would be ballsy enough to make one of their waves 2099?That would work if they want a clean slate of changing casting.
It would be a fun way to have a reboot and not have a reboot at the same time. Flash forward for 5 or 7 films. Back to the regular timeline after that.
I wonder if Dr. Strange ever accidentally summons a demon or something while waving his arms just trying to get the damn sensor controlled paper towel dispenser to work.
Uh oh. Overwhelmingly negative reviews for the first six eps of Iron Fist.
Coming from TV/Film critics, or comics 'experts'?
I'm only two eps in and I'm not hating it, but I'm certainly not loving it.
David Wenham is powerfully miscast, in my opinion (maybe my opinion will change as the series goes on).
Every time I start to get into it, there is a scene that is like it is written by an alien. The ipod/iphone conversation in the park was bananas.
I hope it gets up on its feet, and I will be watching it through to the end, but it's the worst Netflix Marvel show by a long shot right now.
Cloak and Dagger is getting 10 episodes, and so is the oft-rumored New Warriors show featuring Squirrel Girl!!
http://www.avclub.com/article/squirrel-girls-coming-tv-freeforms-new-warriors-se-253237
Cloak and Dagger is getting 10 episodes, and so is the oft-rumored New Warriors show featuring Squirrel Girl!!
http://www.avclub.com/article/squirrel-girls-coming-tv-freeforms-new-warriors-se-253237
I have a friend who is so mad every time a new MCU project is announced that isn't Moon Knight. Looking forward to sharing this with him.
[Granted FOX had the chance and didn't get into Deadpool's less stable personality in his first film, but there was only so much they could introduce in under two hours... possibly the next one.]
The Defenders Announces Premiere Date in First Teaser (http://www.tvguide.com/news/the-defenders-premiere-date-teaser/)
In the brief teaser released on YouTube, Matt Murdock (Charlie Cox), Jessica Jones (Krysten Ritter), Luke Cage (Mike Colter) and Danny Rand (Finn Jones) are riding an elevator in Midland Circle Financial, the mysterious corporation that was behind the literal plot hole in Daredevil's second season. After a few awkward moments riding in silence, Jessica Jones smashes the security camera at the 08:18:20:17 mark.
If that wasn't proof enough for you of The Defenders' premiere date (which we totally get if it wasn't), if you type in the numbers in the teaser's upper left-hand corner into your browser it will redirect you to the website for The New York Bulletin, the newspaper where Daredevil's Karen Page (Deborah Ann Woll) works. At the bottom of the page, there's a note to watch The Defenders beginning Aug. 18.
Why are they doing viral marketing for the combination of four huge TV shows?
There really are going to be 5 after credit scenes in Guardians of the Galaxy 2?
There really are going to be 5 after credit scenes in Guardians of the Galaxy 2?
Yeah, that's what both Gunn and Feige have said. Apparently a lot of mini set-ups for the future films.
I'm still hoping that Death as a character is established in one of the MCU movies prior to Infinity War.I heard from a friend of mine (who runs a comic book and collectables shop, so he gets some information early) that Hela will be Thanos' love interest instead of Death. I'm fine with that, since she is the Goddess of Death in Norse mythology. And that means she will be established as a character before Infinity War, so we don't have to spend time in that already surely crowded movie establishing her.
Full Inhumans royal family cast in costume. I believe the Medusa hair is a 'stand-in' and that it will, in the series, be entirely computer generated (and something closer to a real red color, as in the books). At least, I certainly hope so!
(https://ewedit.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/000254980hr.jpg?w=2700&resize=750%2C500)
Full Inhumans royal family cast in costume. I believe the Medusa hair is a 'stand-in' and that it will, in the series, be entirely computer generated (and something closer to a real red color, as in the books). At least, I certainly hope so!
(https://ewedit.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/000254980hr.jpg?w=2700&resize=750%2C500)
Where's the dog?
Squirrel Girl has been cast! (Also Mister Immortal!)
http://www.avclub.com/article/stop-presses-weve-got-squirrel-girl-casting-news-257901
A prop for a CGI character.
(https://i.redd.it/onaf60dzbfbz.jpg)Is Thanos wearing slacks?
(https://i.redd.it/onaf60dzbfbz.jpg)
Disney Ends Netflix Deal: How It Could Impact the MCU
(https://mcuexchange.com/disney-netflix-mcu/)
In an unexpected turn of events, it was revealed yesterday that Disney would be ending their Netflix contract as part of the company’s plan to create their own streaming service for 2019. The announcement raised a lot of concerns from fans because of its potential effects to the MCU, particularly the Netflix shows. This is a topic that can be confusing to those who don’t carefully watch this part of the entertainment business, so we are going to break it down for our readers as simply as we know how.Spoiler (click to show/hide)
You haven't seen Dr Strange yet then?
Just saw this. The article is lengthy, so the majority of the body of it is in a spoiler.QuoteDisney Ends Netflix Deal: How It Could Impact the MCU
(https://mcuexchange.com/disney-netflix-mcu/)
In an unexpected turn of events, it was revealed yesterday that Disney would be ending their Netflix contract as part of the company’s plan to create their own streaming service for 2019. The announcement raised a lot of concerns from fans because of its potential effects to the MCU, particularly the Netflix shows. This is a topic that can be confusing to those who don’t carefully watch this part of the entertainment business, so we are going to break it down for our readers as simply as we know how.
Well, I watched the first two episodes of The Inhumans - the 'movie' that people were massively ripped off for if they paid to see it in an IMAX theater (there's not even special effects visual grandeur to make up for the rest of it).
I hope that after they're done all this, they release all the movies in one bigass box set. How many is it by now? I lost count years ago.16 so far. The problem with a box set is that not only would it be prohibitively expensive, but the only way this series is going to end is if there are several disasters in a row.
Well, last night I was about to look at the TV Guide to see about tonight's Inhumans episode, and my thought was, "please, god, let it be the last one!"
I wonder if that was the reception for this series that they were going for?
I have a hard time getting into the TV stuff. I haven't even watched the Defenders yet. I'm a lot more interested in the movies.
I have a hard time getting into the TV stuff. I haven't even watched the Defenders yet. I'm a lot more interested in the movies.
Iron Fist was not good, but much easier to watch than Inhumans. I really liked most of the defenders though
I'm glad I saw it, as it was quite good, but I just won't be watching it again.
Jones is next. I think Daredevil just started filming.
If you got Ed Norton and not Eric Bana, you're fine. The story was Norton didn't play well with others, so they booted him when Avengers came to be.
Nope. He's just Mark Ruffalo all of the sudden. Really, they keep it very ambiguous that anything in The Incredible Hulk ever happened at all. Other than the footage of the movie that shows in Iron Man 2, none of the characters or situations from Incredible Hulk are ever mentioned again.
I'm not interested in any TV rendition, but a few days ago, after seeing Thor: Ragnarok, I made up an Amazon shopping list of all the movies.
Did I put the wrong thing on my list or was Bruce Banner played by a different actor in the original movie?
I'm not interested in any TV rendition, but a few days ago, after seeing Thor: Ragnarok, I made up an Amazon shopping list of all the movies.
Did I put the wrong thing on my list or was Bruce Banner played by a different actor in the original movie?
Have you seen many of the other films? None of them are very Thor: Ragnarok-like (Even the other Thor movies).
Yeah, that annoyed me a lot in that movie too. Even for comic book sci-fi nonsense it's pretty bad.
Something bothered me about Ant Man. The power of the suit was that the special chemical made you shrink by reducing the space between your atoms. Okay, I'll suspend disbelief and accept that. But how did he then shrink beyond the atomic level?
BREAKING: Disney/Fox Deal Gaining Momentum, Could Be Imminent (https://mcuexchange.com/breaking-disney-fox-deal-gaining-momentum-imminent/)
November 28, 2017 Charles MurphySpoiler (click to show/hide)
I don't want the fox garbage to just suddenly be part of the MCU. They need a hard reboot if those characters are coming in.
I don't want the fox garbage to just suddenly be part of the MCU. They need a hard reboot if those characters are coming in.
deadpool, of course, would have to comment on it all the time.
BREAKING: Disney and Fox Closing In On Deal; May Be Finalized Next Week (https://mcuexchange.com/fox-disney-deal-finalize/)
That elusive Fox-Disney deal that everyone has been talking about in the past few weeks made some huge strides this past couple of days when 2 big reports dropped regarding its status. One dropped last weekend, stating that the House of Mouse has re-entered talks to purchase several of the companies media assets after reports surfaced that the deal was off. Another dropped last night, stating that Fox has the hots for Disney more than any of the other companies interested in purchasing them, given how they’re a more “strategic fit” and how they present “less regulatory hurdles”. And just now, CNBC dropped a bombshell to top it all off: Disney and Fox are actually closing in on a deal and an announcement may be made next week.
"Walt Disney Co. and 21st Century Fox are closing in on a deal and it could come as soon as next week, according to sources familiar with the matter."
So holy shit. This might actually happen after all. We didn’t think this would be possible in a billion years but here we are, closing in on what could be the biggest entertainment corporation deal in history. The trajectory of this whole Fox-Disney fiasco is a classic Hollywood play: Disney enters lukewarm talks with Fox but it goes nowhere. Fox makes the deal public by letting everyone know what was happening. A bunch of other companies quickly fall in line to negotiate. Suddenly, Disney realizes how important the deal is. Now we’re here. 2017 is going to end on a Fantastic note.
REPORT: Disney and Fox May Have Closed the Deal (https://i.imgur.com/N1Zp0zO.jpg)
According to a report that surfaced late last night, Disney and Fox have closed the deal that would bring the X-Men, Fantastic Four and related characters into the MCU! The report is a bit fuzzy on whether or not it’s reporting on CNBC’s earlier report, or if it is citing it’s own sources, so we are going to hold off on popping the champagne open until the official release, which is expected some time next week.
The Fox-Disney Deal Has Been Finalized; Welcome Home, Fantastic Four & X-Men (https://mcuexchange.com/disney-deal-xmen-mcu-finalized/)
A year ago it was purely fantasy; last spring the rhetoric began to change; today it’s reality. Disney has officially announced a deal that, among many other non-MCU-related factors, will bring the live-action rights to the X-Men and Fantastic Four to Marvel Studios.
Talks between Disney and Fox had been on again, off again over the past few months, as Fox explored its options and courted other suitors. With the recent news that Comcast, the last non-Disney player on the board, had left the game, it was only a matter of time before Bob Iger added to his already impressive legacy at Disney. In an official release…QuoteCombining with Disney are 21st Century Fox’s critically acclaimed film production businesses, including Twentieth Century Fox, Fox Searchlight Pictures and Fox 2000, which together offer diverse and compelling storytelling businesses and are the homes of Avatar, X-Men, Fantastic Four and Deadpool, as well as The Grand Budapest Hotel, Hidden Figures, Gone Girl, The Shape of Water and The Martian—and its storied television creative units, Twentieth Century Fox Television, FX Productions and Fox21, which have brought The Americans, This Is Us, Modern Family, The Simpsons and so many more hit TV series to viewers across the globe. Disney will also acquire FX Networks, National Geographic Partners, Fox Sports Regional Networks, Fox Networks Group International, Star India and Fox’s interests in Hulu, Sky plc, Tata Sky and Endemol Shine Group.
The acquisition of this stellar collection of businesses from 21st Century Fox reflects the increasing consumer demand for a rich diversity of entertainment experiences that are more compelling, accessible and convenient than ever before,” said Robert A. Iger, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, The Walt Disney Company. “We’re honored and grateful that Rupert Murdoch has entrusted us with the future of businesses he spent a lifetime building, and we’re excited about this extraordinary opportunity to significantly increase our portfolio of well-loved franchises and branded content to greatly enhance our growing direct-to-consumer offerings. The deal will also substantially expand our international reach, allowing us to offer world-class storytelling and innovative distribution platforms to more consumers in key markets around the world.”
We are extremely proud of all that we have built at 21st Century Fox, and I firmly believe that this combination with Disney will unlock even more value for shareholders as the new Disney continues to set the pace in what is an exciting and dynamic industry,” said Rupert Murdoch, Executive Chairman of 21st Century Fox. “Furthermore, I’m convinced that this combination, under Bob Iger’s leadership, will be one of the greatest companies in the world. I’m grateful and encouraged that Bob has agreed to stay on, and is committed to succeeding with a combined team that is second to none.
At the request of both 21st Century Fox and the Disney Board of Directors, Mr. Iger has agreed to continue as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Walt Disney Company through the end of calendar year 2021.
When considering this strategic acquisition, it was important to the Board that Bob remain as Chairman and CEO through 2021 to provide the vision and proven leadership required to successfully complete and integrate such a massive, complex undertaking,” said Orin C. Smith, Lead Independent Director of the Disney Board. “We share the belief of our counterparts at 21st Century Fox that extending his tenure is in the best interests of our company and our shareholders, and will be critical to Disney’s ability to effectively drive long-term value from this extraordinary acquisition.
And one more time, here’s the key piece for all of us MCU fans:QuoteThe agreement also provides Disney with the opportunity to reunite the X-Men, Fantastic Four and Deadpool with the Marvel family under one roof and create richer, more complex worlds of inter-related characters and stories that audiences have shown they love.While we are all feeling like kids on Christmas morning with our shiny new toys, it’s probably going to be a while before we get any sort of concrete plan for how Kevin Feige and his crew plan to introduce mutants into the MCU. Feige has been clear that Avengers 4 is the end of a 22-film run, so it’s hard to imagine any of the new characters playing too much of a role in that film. However, beginning in 2020, the sky is the limit!
We’ll have much more for you on this story as it develops, but for now celebrate with your friends. The floodgates are open and the MCU will never be the same!!
Disney CEO Bob Iger Sees An "Opportunity" For R-Rated Marvel Studios Films Down the Line (https://mcuexchange.com/bob-iger-marvel-studio-r-rated/)
Today’s Disney/Fox deal is a dream come true for us here at the MCU Exchange and appears to be the gift that will keep on giving. While many fans were certain that Deadpool, one of Fox’s most successful Marvel properties, would not continue under a Marvel Studios banner (despite Kevin Feige saying it was distinct possibility), Disney boss Bob Iger sees things a little differently:QuoteBen Fritz [Twitter]While many pundits are going to be shocked that “family friendly” Disney would consider an R-rated film, those pundits may not entirely familiar with the types of films that Disney has produced in the past and continues to produce now. This deal, like any other business deal, comes down to money. Bob Iger will walk away from Disney with a very impressive legacy because he knows HOW to make money and he knows Deadpool sequels will make money. Interestingly enough, bringing Deadpool into Marvel Studios could also help open the door for other comic book characters who may be better served in R-rated films as well, so there’s plenty to think about here. Of course Deadpool could also pop up just about anywhere now, just like he does in the comics, and can be used to his full intended effect.
Iger specifically calls out "Deadpool," wants to keep making sequels. "There may be an opportunity for an R-rated Marvel brand as long as we let audiences know what’s coming."
Dr. Doom is like Judge Dredd, we should never see his face. Just get an actor that has a recognizable voice and doesn't mind being in the suit the whole time.
Just give me my Fantastic Four and Silver Surfer movies. And Doctor Doom. Shit, I got to start dream casting Dr. Doom.
X-Men, Fantastic Four and Deadpool Will Expand the MCU, According To Bob Iger (https://mcuexchange.com/bob-iger-xmen-deadpool-fantastic-four-mcu/)
Speaking yesterday with investors, Disney CEO Bob Iger offered some more insight into the company’s plans for their newly acquired properties. While most people didn’t really think Marvel Studios would sit on their hands after acquiring the live-action rights to the X-Men, Fantastic Four and related characters, some pundits have maintained that the characters, especially the X-Men, would stay in their own sandbox. Iger doesn’t agree:QuoteWe’re also looking forward to expanding the Marvel Cinematic Universe to include X-Men, Fantastic Four and Deadpool. Basically Fox — 20th Century Fox Studios — has some interesting tentpole opportunities, we obviously are going to continue to support that. What they’ve done obviously with Avatar, and what they did with Deadpool, X-Men, Fantastic Four, Planet of the Apes is another one. We’ll stay in that business. Not all of it will be branded anything other than what it’s branded today, as a for instance. How much we will create under that banner, we’re still uncertain. It’s going to take a while from a regulatory perspective. They’ll continue to develop in that period of time and at such time as we close this deal and have control, we’ll take stock and really look carefully at what their slate looks like going forward and how many movies it would make sense to make.
And so it seems that for the time being, Fox will proceed as usual with films like X-Men: Dark Phoenix, New Mutants, Deadpool 2 and maybe even Gambit and X-Force. However, once the deal has been approved and Disney takes full ownership of Fox’s studios (potentially 12-18 months from now), we are likely to see Disney hand creative control over these properties to Kevin Feige.
To that end, another report cites that unnamed “insiders” are already hearing that combining the new properties with the robust planned MCU slate could come at the expense of some of Fox’s future plans. Future New Mutants films and other X-films in development (an X-23 spinoff was mentioned) could potentially be pushed to Disney’s upcoming streaming platform while Feige focuses on giving the X-Men and Fantastic Four (and their incredible villains) the treatment they deserve. So while we may never get to see that Multiple Man film, it seems like we might have a chance of seeing Spidey sit on a rooftop with the Human Torch or see Reed Richards talk science with T’Challa. Guess it’s a little give and take.
Ooh! I just realized that Black Panther could potentially get his bride. (Are they still together? I never keep up with his corner of the MU.)
The definitive answer on Disney/Marvel getting all their characters back, and more.
The definitive answer on Disney/Marvel getting all their characters back, and more.
Does that include Namor? I think he's stuck with Universal or something. Also, I guess for reasons, Marvel can use Hulk all they want, but he can't have his own movie (which I think is also a Universal thing). Hope that means I won't be denied a She-Hulk movie.
Pretty sure Marvel confirmed they had Namor back ages ago?The definitive answer on Disney/Marvel getting all their characters back, and more.Does that include Namor? I think he's stuck with Universal or something. Also, I guess for reasons, Marvel can use Hulk all they want, but he can't have his own movie (which I think is also a Universal thing). Hope that means I won't be denied a She-Hulk movie.
The Rights For Namor The Sub-Mariner Apparently Back At Marvel... (https://mcuexchange.com/the-rights-for-namor-the-sub-mariner-apparently-back-at-marvel-brian-tee-wants-the-role/)
June 3, 2016
The MCU is on course to expand quite a bit over the next few years with characters such as Doctor Strange and Captain Marvel hitting the big screen soon. Among that, we’ve also got several other smaller roles in the upcoming Thor: Ragnarok and Guardians Of The Galaxy Vol 2. As for other new characters, we don’t know exactly where Marvel will go next since big properties such as the X-Men and Fantastic Four sit with other studios. However one that it seems they’ve gotten back recently is Namor the Sub-Mariner.
In his appearance on Kevin Smith’s Fatman on Batman podcast, Joe Quesada, Chief Creative Officer for Marvel Studios, was questioned on if we would ever see Namor in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. While he couldn’t confirm or deny any plans for a movie based on the character, he did seemingly confirm that the rights for the character on the big screen are back with Marvel Studios.QuoteI can’t speak for studios…As far as I know, yeah we do. It’s not at Fox, it’s not at Sony…Yeah.Obviously this doesn’t tell us that we’ll be seeing a movie based on the character anytime soon, but at least we know he has the potential to join the MCU at some point in the future. The rights for Namor were previously thought to be held by Universal Pictures, with Kevin Feige stating that it was “complicated”. For now, we’ll just have to wait and see.
2. Namor
Namor the Sub-Mariner is a mutant underwater superhero that has super strength, can breathe underwater and fly. The live-action movie rights to Namor were purchased by Universal Studios along with Hulk in the 1990s. They never used Namor and never made a movie although some planning for a movie was done in 1996.
When asked about the rights for Namor Kevin Feige said, “It’s slightly more complicated than that. Let’s put it this way – there are entanglements that make it less easy. There are older contracts that still involve other parties that mean we need to work things out before we move forward on it. As opposed to an Iron Man or any of the Avengers or any of the other Marvel characters where we could just put them in.”
So, for now, Marvel can’t make a Namor movie without some work and money changing hands. Since most people haven’t even heard of Namor it’s not a huge draw.
People actually care about Namor? The only impression I ever got about him was that he was a arrogant asshat.
While I am COMPLETELY disinterested in Namor, I have no doubt Marvel Studios would have me rushing to Toys R Us to get a figure for my desk by the end of the movie if they made one.Yeah, Namor is definitely the Aquaman of the MCU... what? Too on the nose? ;D
While I am COMPLETELY disinterested in Namor, I have no doubt Marvel Studios would have me rushing to Toys R Us to get a figure for my desk by the end of the movie if they made one.Yeah, Namor is definitely the Aquaman of the MCU... what? Too on the nose? ;D
Last nights episode of SHIELD was the best one of the season. This has been a weird story line. Not sure that the show will last past this season though which is a shame.
FINALLY! We Have a 'Cloak And Dagger' Premiere Date (https://mcuexchange.com/marvel-cloak-dagger-premiere-date/)[Article title is a link to a very slightly expanded article.]
Let the countdown begin, because at the winter TCAs, Freeform announced that Cloak And Dagger will be coming to television on Thursday, June 7. According to Variety, Cloak and Dagger will have a monstrous two-hour premiere.QuoteThis may be the only new show that we see on cable television for the MCU, as we recently learned that there won’t be any new Marvel projects on ABC this year.
But I think Thor: Ragnarok is likely to do this as well. Sadly, Disney isn't releasing that domestically in 3D at all (GotGv2 was only available in 3D in an exclusive Best Buy steelbook with the 4K version which sold out pretty much immediately).That's wierd. Is the 3D fad starting to die down finally?
When I hear "Complete" and "C7 - C8" I think action figure collecting. On some scales an action figure in C7-8 condition would be worn but still functional but I don't think it's quite clever enough to be a joke.
'Avengers: Infinity War' Release Date Moves Up One Week to April (https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/avengers-infinity-war-release-date-moves-april-1089951)
Marvel Studios and Disney' biggest superhero mashup yet is hitting North American theaters earlier than expected.
Avengers: Infinity War will now unfurl April 27, a week before its earlier launch date of May 4. In other words, the summer box office will kick off earlier than expected (the first weekend in May is historically considered the official start of the summer season).
The move means that the comic book blockbuster, directed by Anthony and Joe Russo, will open day-and-date around the globe, reducing the possibility of spoilers marring the experience for North American audiences. Marvel president Kevin Feige has said the film will have big ramifications for the Marvel Cinematic Universe, so much so that the title for 2019's Avengers 4 has not yet been revealed, as the name itself would be a spoiler.
Release Dates Revealed for Six New Untitled Marvel Films (https://mcuexchange.com/new-release-dates-mcu-2022/)
Disney has moved up the release of one of its 2020 Marvel releases to July 31, 2020 (previously August 7, 2020). After that, six slots have been carved out on May 7, 2021, July 30, 2021, Nov. 5, 2021, Feb. 18, 2022, May 6, 2022, and July 29, 2022.
Loved the first season of The Punisher, even though it was quite dark, although I'm a little concerned about the story they are rumored to be adapting for the next season.
This is either the best or worst idea ever, but they should do what the comics do. Tell the core story through the big summer crossover event (Avengers) and then add to the story through their other monthly titles (Captain Marvel, Guardians 3, etc..)
I still wish we knew more about Thanos going into Infinity War. We don't even know about his relationship with Hela...
Matt Damon plays Loki, Sam Neill plays Odin, and Thor is portrayed by Westworld actor and Chris Hemsworth’s real-life older brother, Luke Hemsworth.
'The Defenders' Showrunner Explains Connections Between 'Iron Fist' Mythology and New York (https://mcuexchange.com/ramirez-defenders-dragon-iron-fist/)QuoteQ: That dragon skeleton — that wasn’t Shou-Lao the Undying’s, is it? It’s just a pile of bones implying that there had been dragons all over the world and one wound up buried under New York?
A: Yeah, it’s the second one. The idea of that was that there had always been this kind of mystery that the Hand can bring people back from the dead, but we never knew exactly how, and it made sense to connect the life-force idea of the chi in the Iron Fist to the idea of the life force [the Hand members] use for various purposes, so we’re just saying it’s dragon bone that they use, that that’s the substance. That felt like the cleanest way to tie everything in.
And it’s been set up since Daredevil season 1; Gao operates in the background of New York with drugs made from that ground into powder. It felt like we could make back alley drug deals in New York and dragon mythology all part of the same story, so that was my way of trying to tie them all in.
It seems like a waste to put some of the limited supply of an ancient substance which provides immortality into street drugs, but evidently tying things together was more important than things making sense.
Joe Russo Admits The 'Spider-Man: Homecoming' Timeline Change Was A Mistake (https://mcuexchange.com/8-years-later-mistake-homecoming/)
(https://i.imgur.com/N1n35Dy.jpg)
(link to embiggen: https://i.imgur.com/N1n35Dy.jpg )
https://www.reddit.com/r/marvelstudios/comments/7w69wn/10_years_in_the_making/dtxtyhb/?st=jdetldo1&sh=74c96248
Sorry :(
There’s an infinity war reference in the newest episode.
- - - CAUTION: NOT a true spoiler! - - -
https://news.avclub.com/comcast-doesnt-want-wolverine-and-captain-america-to-fi-1826811614
The Disney buyout of Fox may not happen after all. Comcast is trying to outbid Disney with more cash. Read more HERE (https://mcuexchange.com/comcast-outbid-disney-fox/).Did I miss something new (other than the snark at the end of the article)?
https://news.avclub.com/comcast-doesnt-want-wolverine-and-captain-america-to-fi-1826811614
Just curious, I didn't see any info in there that wasn't in this article:The Disney buyout of Fox may not happen after all. Comcast is trying to outbid Disney with more cash. Read more HERE (https://mcuexchange.com/comcast-outbid-disney-fox/).Did I miss something new (other than the snark at the end of the article)?
https://news.avclub.com/comcast-doesnt-want-wolverine-and-captain-america-to-fi-1826811614
Just curious, I didn't see any info in there that wasn't in this article:The Disney buyout of Fox may not happen after all. Comcast is trying to outbid Disney with more cash. Read more HERE (https://mcuexchange.com/comcast-outbid-disney-fox/).Did I miss something new (other than the snark at the end of the article)?
Yours reports a 'counter offer "in the advanced stages" that some estimated it to be in the range of $60 billion in cash,' the new one says it happened and what it actually was ($65 billion in cash for the whole lot). Seemed like an update to me.
https://news.avclub.com/comcast-doesnt-want-wolverine-and-captain-america-to-fi-1826811614
Just curious, I didn't see any info in there that wasn't in this article:The Disney buyout of Fox may not happen after all. Comcast is trying to outbid Disney with more cash. Read more HERE (https://mcuexchange.com/comcast-outbid-disney-fox/).Did I miss something new (other than the snark at the end of the article)?
Yours reports a 'counter offer "in the advanced stages" that some estimated it to be in the range of $60 billion in cash,' the new one says it happened and what it actually was ($65 billion in cash for the whole lot). Seemed like an update to me.
Indeed - sorry. I posted that in the middle of overall confusion (following two weeks of disruption caused by three cracked teeth and leading to the first of likely two root canals).
Here is the 'final say' on the bidding war:
FANTASTIC: Fox Accepts Disney's $71 Billion Bid Offer (https://mcuexchange.com/outmatching-comcast-fox-accepts-71-billion-bid-from-disney/)
I get why this is bad in a very general sense, but within the context of this thread and topic - it's pretty great news. More for the Fantastic Four than the X-Men though. I am a bit worried about what adding X-Men will do. BUT they've been pretty consistently smart so far, so I remain fairly optimistic.
Although, with the FOX Studios assets (movie production), it is possible that the MCU could potentially ramp up film production (I am hoping) and add an additional two (or more) films a year where the X-Men-related films used to fall. That way, they could make either FF and X-Men films in parallel with already-planned Feige MCU plans (best option, I think), or else speed up the production of the long-term Feige plans so that they are done and space made for other franchises, sooner.
Cloak & Dagger isn't completely terrible. I was worried about the characters being in High School, but it still has a Marvel "Netflix" feel to it. Real slow paced at times, but somewhat interesting to see the origin story progress. (I think Runaways was a little better)
BREAKING: James Gunn No Longer Directing 'Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3' (https://mcuexchange.com/james-gunn-departs-gotg-vol-3/)
In what might be the biggest blow to the MCU yet, James Gunn has been removed as the director of Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3. This decision comes right a controversy surrounding deleted tweets by the director that jokingly and disgustingly touched on pedophilia and rape. Gunn has since deleted his account. Walt Disney chairman Alan Horn had this to say on the firing of Gunn:QuoteThe offensive attitudes and statements discovered on James’ Twitter feed are indefensible and inconsistent with our studio’s values, and we have severed our business relationship with him.
The entirety of the Guardians franchise was solely Gunn’s vision. Guardians was the only MCU franchise whose DNA and essence were distilled purely from Gunn’s own voice. Now out of the picture, there’s no telling where the third film will end up or if the film will continue production on schedule. We have yet to hear from Gunn’s immediate superiors at Marvel Studios so stay tuned here.
Yeah, but he also apologized for those comments 6 years ago.QuoteBREAKING: James Gunn No Longer Directing 'Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3' (https://mcuexchange.com/james-gunn-departs-gotg-vol-3/)
In what might be the biggest blow to the MCU yet, James Gunn has been removed as the director of Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3. This decision comes right a controversy surrounding deleted tweets by the director that jokingly and disgustingly touched on pedophilia and rape. Gunn has since deleted his account. Walt Disney chairman Alan Horn had this to say on the firing of Gunn:QuoteThe offensive attitudes and statements discovered on James’ Twitter feed are indefensible and inconsistent with our studio’s values, and we have severed our business relationship with him.
The entirety of the Guardians franchise was solely Gunn’s vision. Guardians was the only MCU franchise whose DNA and essence were distilled purely from Gunn’s own voice. Now out of the picture, there’s no telling where the third film will end up or if the film will continue production on schedule. We have yet to hear from Gunn’s immediate superiors at Marvel Studios so stay tuned here.
Unfortunately, unless he was already scheduled for a solo film of his own, this does not bode well for Adam Warlock's presence in the MCU.
Just to be clear: I think that joking about pedophilia and rape is unacceptable, particularly on social media. So I don't fault Disney's zero tolerance, especially given the image they've cultivated for about 80-90 years now.
Yeah, but he also apologized for those comments 6 years ago.QuoteBREAKING: James Gunn No Longer Directing 'Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3' (https://mcuexchange.com/james-gunn-departs-gotg-vol-3/)
In what might be the biggest blow to the MCU yet, James Gunn has been removed as the director of Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3. This decision comes right a controversy surrounding deleted tweets by the director that jokingly and disgustingly touched on pedophilia and rape. Gunn has since deleted his account. Walt Disney chairman Alan Horn had this to say on the firing of Gunn:QuoteThe offensive attitudes and statements discovered on James’ Twitter feed are indefensible and inconsistent with our studio’s values, and we have severed our business relationship with him.
The entirety of the Guardians franchise was solely Gunn’s vision. Guardians was the only MCU franchise whose DNA and essence were distilled purely from Gunn’s own voice. Now out of the picture, there’s no telling where the third film will end up or if the film will continue production on schedule. We have yet to hear from Gunn’s immediate superiors at Marvel Studios so stay tuned here.
Unfortunately, unless he was already scheduled for a solo film of his own, this does not bode well for Adam Warlock's presence in the MCU.
Just to be clear: I think that joking about pedophilia and rape is unacceptable, particularly on social media. So I don't fault Disney's zero tolerance, especially given the image they've cultivated for about 80-90 years now.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/guardians-galaxy-director-james-gunn-395796 (https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/guardians-galaxy-director-james-gunn-395796)Yeah, but he also apologized for those comments 6 years ago.QuoteBREAKING: James Gunn No Longer Directing 'Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3' (https://mcuexchange.com/james-gunn-departs-gotg-vol-3/)
In what might be the biggest blow to the MCU yet, James Gunn has been removed as the director of Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3. This decision comes right a controversy surrounding deleted tweets by the director that jokingly and disgustingly touched on pedophilia and rape. Gunn has since deleted his account. Walt Disney chairman Alan Horn had this to say on the firing of Gunn:QuoteThe offensive attitudes and statements discovered on James’ Twitter feed are indefensible and inconsistent with our studio’s values, and we have severed our business relationship with him.
The entirety of the Guardians franchise was solely Gunn’s vision. Guardians was the only MCU franchise whose DNA and essence were distilled purely from Gunn’s own voice. Now out of the picture, there’s no telling where the third film will end up or if the film will continue production on schedule. We have yet to hear from Gunn’s immediate superiors at Marvel Studios so stay tuned here.
Unfortunately, unless he was already scheduled for a solo film of his own, this does not bode well for Adam Warlock's presence in the MCU.
Just to be clear: I think that joking about pedophilia and rape is unacceptable, particularly on social media. So I don't fault Disney's zero tolerance, especially given the image they've cultivated for about 80-90 years now.
He left them up, so if he DID apologise for them (and I've not seen anyone reporting that he has) then he's pretty dumb.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/guardians-galaxy-director-james-gunn-395796 (https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/guardians-galaxy-director-james-gunn-395796)Yeah, but he also apologized for those comments 6 years ago.QuoteBREAKING: James Gunn No Longer Directing 'Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3' (https://mcuexchange.com/james-gunn-departs-gotg-vol-3/)
In what might be the biggest blow to the MCU yet, James Gunn has been removed as the director of Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3. This decision comes right a controversy surrounding deleted tweets by the director that jokingly and disgustingly touched on pedophilia and rape. Gunn has since deleted his account. Walt Disney chairman Alan Horn had this to say on the firing of Gunn:QuoteThe offensive attitudes and statements discovered on James’ Twitter feed are indefensible and inconsistent with our studio’s values, and we have severed our business relationship with him.
The entirety of the Guardians franchise was solely Gunn’s vision. Guardians was the only MCU franchise whose DNA and essence were distilled purely from Gunn’s own voice. Now out of the picture, there’s no telling where the third film will end up or if the film will continue production on schedule. We have yet to hear from Gunn’s immediate superiors at Marvel Studios so stay tuned here.
Unfortunately, unless he was already scheduled for a solo film of his own, this does not bode well for Adam Warlock's presence in the MCU.
Just to be clear: I think that joking about pedophilia and rape is unacceptable, particularly on social media. So I don't fault Disney's zero tolerance, especially given the image they've cultivated for about 80-90 years now.
He left them up, so if he DID apologise for them (and I've not seen anyone reporting that he has) then he's pretty dumb.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/guardians-galaxy-director-james-gunn-395796 (https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/guardians-galaxy-director-james-gunn-395796)Yeah, but he also apologized for those comments 6 years ago.QuoteBREAKING: James Gunn No Longer Directing 'Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3' (https://mcuexchange.com/james-gunn-departs-gotg-vol-3/)
In what might be the biggest blow to the MCU yet, James Gunn has been removed as the director of Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3. This decision comes right a controversy surrounding deleted tweets by the director that jokingly and disgustingly touched on pedophilia and rape. Gunn has since deleted his account. Walt Disney chairman Alan Horn had this to say on the firing of Gunn:QuoteThe offensive attitudes and statements discovered on James’ Twitter feed are indefensible and inconsistent with our studio’s values, and we have severed our business relationship with him.
The entirety of the Guardians franchise was solely Gunn’s vision. Guardians was the only MCU franchise whose DNA and essence were distilled purely from Gunn’s own voice. Now out of the picture, there’s no telling where the third film will end up or if the film will continue production on schedule. We have yet to hear from Gunn’s immediate superiors at Marvel Studios so stay tuned here.
Unfortunately, unless he was already scheduled for a solo film of his own, this does not bode well for Adam Warlock's presence in the MCU.
Just to be clear: I think that joking about pedophilia and rape is unacceptable, particularly on social media. So I don't fault Disney's zero tolerance, especially given the image they've cultivated for about 80-90 years now.
He left them up, so if he DID apologise for them (and I've not seen anyone reporting that he has) then he's pretty dumb.
That doesn't cover all of the pedophile and rape jokes. And these blog posts WERE taken down. I don't think you know what this news story is about?
Check the comments here for screenshots:
https://news.avclub.com/james-gunn-fired-from-guardians-of-the-galaxy-vol-3-o-1827757055
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/guardians-galaxy-director-james-gunn-395796 (https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/guardians-galaxy-director-james-gunn-395796)Yeah, but he also apologized for those comments 6 years ago.QuoteBREAKING: James Gunn No Longer Directing 'Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3' (https://mcuexchange.com/james-gunn-departs-gotg-vol-3/)
In what might be the biggest blow to the MCU yet, James Gunn has been removed as the director of Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3. This decision comes right a controversy surrounding deleted tweets by the director that jokingly and disgustingly touched on pedophilia and rape. Gunn has since deleted his account. Walt Disney chairman Alan Horn had this to say on the firing of Gunn:QuoteThe offensive attitudes and statements discovered on James’ Twitter feed are indefensible and inconsistent with our studio’s values, and we have severed our business relationship with him.
The entirety of the Guardians franchise was solely Gunn’s vision. Guardians was the only MCU franchise whose DNA and essence were distilled purely from Gunn’s own voice. Now out of the picture, there’s no telling where the third film will end up or if the film will continue production on schedule. We have yet to hear from Gunn’s immediate superiors at Marvel Studios so stay tuned here.
Unfortunately, unless he was already scheduled for a solo film of his own, this does not bode well for Adam Warlock's presence in the MCU.
Just to be clear: I think that joking about pedophilia and rape is unacceptable, particularly on social media. So I don't fault Disney's zero tolerance, especially given the image they've cultivated for about 80-90 years now.
He left them up, so if he DID apologise for them (and I've not seen anyone reporting that he has) then he's pretty dumb.
That doesn't cover all of the pedophile and rape jokes. And these blog posts WERE taken down. I don't think you know what this news story is about?
Check the comments here for screenshots:
https://news.avclub.com/james-gunn-fired-from-guardians-of-the-galaxy-vol-3-o-1827757055
And in the link you provided there's an update and a continued apology.
Did you check the date on article I linked to you, because it seems like he did apologize back then?https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/guardians-galaxy-director-james-gunn-395796 (https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/guardians-galaxy-director-james-gunn-395796)Yeah, but he also apologized for those comments 6 years ago.QuoteBREAKING: James Gunn No Longer Directing 'Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3' (https://mcuexchange.com/james-gunn-departs-gotg-vol-3/)
In what might be the biggest blow to the MCU yet, James Gunn has been removed as the director of Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3. This decision comes right a controversy surrounding deleted tweets by the director that jokingly and disgustingly touched on pedophilia and rape. Gunn has since deleted his account. Walt Disney chairman Alan Horn had this to say on the firing of Gunn:QuoteThe offensive attitudes and statements discovered on James’ Twitter feed are indefensible and inconsistent with our studio’s values, and we have severed our business relationship with him.
The entirety of the Guardians franchise was solely Gunn’s vision. Guardians was the only MCU franchise whose DNA and essence were distilled purely from Gunn’s own voice. Now out of the picture, there’s no telling where the third film will end up or if the film will continue production on schedule. We have yet to hear from Gunn’s immediate superiors at Marvel Studios so stay tuned here.
Unfortunately, unless he was already scheduled for a solo film of his own, this does not bode well for Adam Warlock's presence in the MCU.
Just to be clear: I think that joking about pedophilia and rape is unacceptable, particularly on social media. So I don't fault Disney's zero tolerance, especially given the image they've cultivated for about 80-90 years now.
He left them up, so if he DID apologise for them (and I've not seen anyone reporting that he has) then he's pretty dumb.
That doesn't cover all of the pedophile and rape jokes. And these blog posts WERE taken down. I don't think you know what this news story is about?
Check the comments here for screenshots:
https://news.avclub.com/james-gunn-fired-from-guardians-of-the-galaxy-vol-3-o-1827757055
And in the link you provided there's an update and a continued apology.
I'm aware he has since apologised, he didn't apologise six years ago, which seems to be what you were saying?
Did you check the date on article I linked to you, because it seems like he did apologize back then?https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/guardians-galaxy-director-james-gunn-395796 (https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/guardians-galaxy-director-james-gunn-395796)Yeah, but he also apologized for those comments 6 years ago.QuoteBREAKING: James Gunn No Longer Directing 'Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3' (https://mcuexchange.com/james-gunn-departs-gotg-vol-3/)
In what might be the biggest blow to the MCU yet, James Gunn has been removed as the director of Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3. This decision comes right a controversy surrounding deleted tweets by the director that jokingly and disgustingly touched on pedophilia and rape. Gunn has since deleted his account. Walt Disney chairman Alan Horn had this to say on the firing of Gunn:QuoteThe offensive attitudes and statements discovered on James’ Twitter feed are indefensible and inconsistent with our studio’s values, and we have severed our business relationship with him.
The entirety of the Guardians franchise was solely Gunn’s vision. Guardians was the only MCU franchise whose DNA and essence were distilled purely from Gunn’s own voice. Now out of the picture, there’s no telling where the third film will end up or if the film will continue production on schedule. We have yet to hear from Gunn’s immediate superiors at Marvel Studios so stay tuned here.
Unfortunately, unless he was already scheduled for a solo film of his own, this does not bode well for Adam Warlock's presence in the MCU.
Just to be clear: I think that joking about pedophilia and rape is unacceptable, particularly on social media. So I don't fault Disney's zero tolerance, especially given the image they've cultivated for about 80-90 years now.
He left them up, so if he DID apologise for them (and I've not seen anyone reporting that he has) then he's pretty dumb.
That doesn't cover all of the pedophile and rape jokes. And these blog posts WERE taken down. I don't think you know what this news story is about?
Check the comments here for screenshots:
https://news.avclub.com/james-gunn-fired-from-guardians-of-the-galaxy-vol-3-o-1827757055
And in the link you provided there's an update and a continued apology.
I'm aware he has since apologised, he didn't apologise six years ago, which seems to be what you were saying?
UNCANNY: Fox Shareholders Vote "Yes" on Disney Deal (https://mcuexchange.com/fox-shareholders-approve-disney/)
Disney finally stands triumphant as Fox and Disney shareholders have voted ‘yes’ on Disney’s bid for 21st Century Fox assets. Now, while the deal is done, the merger isn’t. I was actually mistaken in my reading of the situation in my last article about this, as they’ll still need regulation approval globally, which I neglected to take into account or mention.
I heard this story in passing, but couldn't figure out what James Gunn played in the movies. So then when it turned out he was the director, I didn't care as much.He did have a large amount of control over the Guardians films, though. I’ll miss his behind the scenes posts and insight. Twitter is alright for keeping in touch, but you also can have a bit of anonymity if you want. Granted the moderation is rather crap.
I wonder why anybody has a Twitter account. It seems like it's all downside and no upside. Does any good ever come of Twitter? I personally think it's the worst invention of the past 10 years.
I heard this story in passing, but couldn't figure out what James Gunn played in the movies. So then when it turned out he was the director, I didn't care as much.He did have a large amount of control over the Guardians films, though. I’ll miss his behind the scenes posts and insight. Twitter is alright for keeping in touch, but you also can have a bit of anonymity if you want. Granted the moderation is rather crap.
I wonder why anybody has a Twitter account. It seems like it's all downside and no upside. Does any good ever come of Twitter? I personally think it's the worst invention of the past 10 years.
I heard this story in passing, but couldn't figure out what James Gunn played in the movies. So then when it turned out he was the director, I didn't care as much.He did have a large amount of control over the Guardians films, though. I’ll miss his behind the scenes posts and insight. Twitter is alright for keeping in touch, but you also can have a bit of anonymity if you want. Granted the moderation is rather crap.
I wonder why anybody has a Twitter account. It seems like it's all downside and no upside. Does any good ever come of Twitter? I personally think it's the worst invention of the past 10 years.
The 280 character limit bothers me the most. By encouraging brevity, it takes pains to discourage insightful thought. Complex thought is out in favor of pursuing popularity through retweets and racking up followers. I've always hated Twitter, but I've been especially hateful of it ever since I learned about the Justine Sacco incident and all the "good" people who went took pains to ruin her life for the sake of popularity.
Anyway, I guess I'm getting off topic.
While off Earth, Thor became the same narcissistic, opportunistic, selfish ass he was at the start of the first Thor film. He used - and lied to - both Hulk and Banner to get his own way, and planned to use Banner/Hulk as a powerful weapon in his fight with Hera, regardless of the potential damage it could have caused (Banner thinking he might never be able to change back). He was a manipulative asshole with no concern for anything but his own wants. He basically became Loki.
While off Earth, Thor became the same narcissistic, opportunistic, selfish ass he was at the start of the first Thor film. He used - and lied to - both Hulk and Banner to get his own way, and planned to use Banner/Hulk as a powerful weapon in his fight with Hera, regardless of the potential damage it could have caused (Banner thinking he might never be able to change back). He was a manipulative asshole with no concern for anything but his own wants. He basically became Loki.
To be fair, his wants were to save the entire universe from being enslaved by his sister. Not to mention saving his people from her.
And he was also dealing with his father's death and a terrible side of him he only just learned about.
And yet, he couldn't be honest with Banner/Hulk - someone he counts among his few friends - to accomplish that? Someone who already showed his willingness to potentially fight and sacrifice his life to help others at Thor's side in the first two Avenger films? If Thor honestly discussed how horrific Hera's rule of the nine realms would be, and how imminent it would be if not stopped, Banner would be - as he ultimately was on his own - on board regardless of the possible effects to his consciousness potentially being submerged. The manipulation was UGLY on Thor's part.
Also, for me to believe that ANY of what you said was a component of the character in the film, none of Thor's manipulation of Banner/Hulk should have been played for laughs, which ALL of it was. If it had been played with Thor clearly appearing desperate, it would be different. But it was played as funny. The result, as a viewer, was the opposite: I grew to hate Thor in that film.
Despite not caring for it, I've seen Thor: Ragnarok about five times (each time it gets more aversive). There was no indicator in the film that any of what you've written here was intended by the filmmakers to be the explanation for what happened. This is YOUR rationalization of the film to make it palatable. I have no problem with that. But to have it be an actual part of the film, there had to be something in the film itself that said any of this. Thor spent more time mourning Mjolnir in the film than he did saying anything about what his father did prior to Thor's birth. That tells me his emotional priorities.
On the other hand, it was funny and fun.
Fox Will Be Ready to Close Disney Deal Jan. 1, Says Peter Rice (https://variety.com/2018/biz/news/disney-fox-deal-will-be-ready-to-close-jan-1-says-peter-rice-exclusive-1202976061/)
Fox will be logistically ready for its pending mega-deal with the Walt Disney Co. to close Jan. 1, top exec Peter Rice told employees Wednesday. According to sources present at a town hall meeting on the Fox lot in Los Angeles, Rice reiterated that the deal is still on track to close sometime in the first half of 2019, either in the first or second quarter. But he said that structure of New Fox — down to elements such as human resources and payroll — will be ready to go by Jan. 1. Regulatory processes will likely drag the ultimate closure beyond that date.
Unfortunately, it may be due to the de-coupling of Marvel and Netflix. That said, while I have my doubts, maybe it'll be back on the new Disney streaming service.
Unfortunately, it may be due to the de-coupling of Marvel and Netflix. That said, while I have my doubts, maybe it'll be back on the new Disney streaming service.They previously announced the new streaming service wasn’t going to impact on the Netflix shows. Also, reportedly the Luke Cage axing came from Netflix’s end, not Disney.
Unfortunately, it may be due to the de-coupling of Marvel and Netflix. That said, while I have my doubts, maybe it'll be back on the new Disney streaming service.They previously announced the new streaming service wasn’t going to impact on the Netflix shows. Also, reportedly the Luke Cage axing came from Netflix’s end, not Disney.
That's unfortunate. Well, possibly Disney will feel there's enough value to it to continue it (or a 'Heroes for Hire' show, as you said in the earlier post), even if Netflix didn't think it was profitable enough for them to continue.
Unfortunately, it may be due to the de-coupling of Marvel and Netflix. That said, while I have my doubts, maybe it'll be back on the new Disney streaming service.They previously announced the new streaming service wasn’t going to impact on the Netflix shows. Also, reportedly the Luke Cage axing came from Netflix’s end, not Disney.
That's unfortunate. Well, possibly Disney will feel there's enough value to it to continue it (or a 'Heroes for Hire' show, as you said in the earlier post), even if Netflix didn't think it was profitable enough for them to continue.
From what I've been reading it was "creative differences" that killed the show, I guess Netflix didn't like the ideas and scripts that were written for season 3 and no one could come up with a compromise.
Unfortunately, it may be due to the de-coupling of Marvel and Netflix. That said, while I have my doubts, maybe it'll be back on the new Disney streaming service.They previously announced the new streaming service wasn’t going to impact on the Netflix shows. Also, reportedly the Luke Cage axing came from Netflix’s end, not Disney.
That's unfortunate. Well, possibly Disney will feel there's enough value to it to continue it (or a 'Heroes for Hire' show, as you said in the earlier post), even if Netflix didn't think it was profitable enough for them to continue.
From what I've been reading it was "creative differences" that killed the show, I guess Netflix didn't like the ideas and scripts that were written for season 3 and no one could come up with a compromise.
That's a shame if it's the case. Usually you just get a new showrunner in that kind of situation though? Netflix are pretty notoriously 'the numbers say this, so this is how you need to structure your show' though.
You know what I'd LOVE in Avengers 4? Yes, I know it's not going to happen(probably not anytime soon anyway), but I'd love for there to be an Avengers movie where Wanda introduces the Avengers to her Dad."And this is my boyfriend, Vision. He's three years old."
BREAKING: Daredevil Cancelled by Netflix (https://mcuexchange.com/breaking-daredevil-cancelled-by-netfix/)
The biggest domino has now fallen, as Netflix, in a statement made to Deadline earlier this evening, has cancelled its headlining Marvel show despite rave reviews over the 3rd season, which aired only a month ago.
QuoteMarvel’s Daredevil will not return for a fourth season on Netflix,” the streamer said in a statement tonight to Deadline. “We are tremendously proud of the show’s last and final season and although it’s painful for the fans, we feel it best to close this chapter on a high note. We’re thankful to our partners at Marvel, showrunner Erik Oleson, the show’s writers, stellar crew and incredible cast including Charlie Cox as Daredevil himself, and we’re grateful to the fans who have supported the show over the years.
Given this fairly recent announcements of Iron Fist and Luke Cage cancellations, this hardly comes as a surprise, but does appear to officailly signal that the end of the MCU on Netflix is imminent, and likely will not last beyond Season 3 of Jessica Jones and Season 2 of Punisher. The writing has been on the wall from the noticeable lack of marketing for recent seasons of these shows to the apparent removal of the Defenders Facebook page, but the saddest sign of all being that, while it originally seemed like Netflix and Marvel were entering into a broader agreement by releasing four shows in one year, it now seems possible, if not likely, that this was only because Netflix wanted to get their commitments out of the way so that they could focus on properties produced in house.
Daredevil brought us some truly tremendous moments. From bringing characters like Matt Murdock, Wilson Fisk, and Frank Castle to life to revolutionizing the one-shot fight scene, the show will have a lasting legacy moreso than the other MCU Netflix properties, and you can’t help but wonder what Marvel will do with these characters and actors in the longterm. Will they wait years before trying to reboot with a whole new cast, or will they will try to continue the story at some point on the streaming service? My guess would be the former, but we’ll just have to wait and see.
You know what I'd LOVE in Avengers 4? Yes, I know it's not going to happen(probably not anytime soon anyway), but I'd love for there to be an Avengers movie where Wanda introduces the Avengers to her Dad.
You know what I'd LOVE in Avengers 4? Yes, I know it's not going to happen(probably not anytime soon anyway), but I'd love for there to be an Avengers movie where Wanda introduces the Avengers to her Dad.
Weren't her parents killed by a bomb built by Stark Enterprises? Hence her and Pietro's initial hatred of Tony Stark.
https://news.avclub.com/forget-iron-fist-marvel-studios-is-making-a-shang-chi-1830839668If they want an Asian character, I'd rather see a spinoff movie or show based on Wong from the Dr. Strange movie.
https://news.avclub.com/forget-iron-fist-marvel-studios-is-making-a-shang-chi-1830839668If they want an Asian character, I'd rather see a spinoff movie or show based on Wong from the Dr. Strange movie.
Jeph Loeb Says He Won't Be Surprised if Cancelled Marvel-Netflix Shows Get Revived (https://mcuexchange.com/jeph-loeb-netflix-hopeful/)
...QuoteI would not be surprised if any of those things reemerged. It depends on showrunner, it depends on availability of cast, all of those things. It’s not like we’re a doctor show where the show got canceled because of bad ratings. These are shows that have very different reasons [for ending], most of which I’m not at liberty to talk about, nor should anyone really care at the end of day.
'Jessica Jones' and 'The Punisher' Officially Cancelled by Netflix (https://mcuexchange.com/jessica-jones-punisher-cancelled-netflix/)
Jon Bernthal Bids Goodbye to 'Punisher' Role Ahead of Official Cancellation Announcement (https://mcuexchange.com/jon-bernthal-farewell-punisher-netflix/)
BREAKING: James Gunn Will Return To Direct 'Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3' (https://mcuexchange.com/james-gunn-returns-gotg-vol-3/):clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
Today, Deadline dropped a huge bombshell on the matter: Gunn’s back for the third film. According to the trade, Disney’s decision to bring back Gunn into the billion-dollar cosmic universe he built from the ground was made several months ago after several meetings with Gunn and Kevin Feige‘s Marvel Studios team.
. . .
Shortly after he was fired, Gunn was quickly tapped by the Distinguished Competition to direct the sequel to their mega-hit Suicide Squad, further complicating the situation. Interestingly enough, Gunn has also received Disney’s good graces to push through with DC’s villain team-up, further delaying an already-delayed Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3.
The Disney-Fox Acquisition To Officially Take Effect Tomorrow (https://mcuexchange.com/fox-disney-acquisition-mcu-effect/)
I've actually been curious about how that figure works out for the whole MCU. I tried to look it up the other day, but the Internet has failed me. Which character has made the most appearances in the MCU?
(https://scontent-ort2-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/61557435_10158086454815752_5294432041482321920_n.jpg?_nc_cat=1&_nc_oc=AQlKhzfYAVwYIVQt-oBuEoOlIKHm-3upw6eU3NsAJL0Vyv3hIZHLzTnIo2rAGJsGrWXMta1oOadXy7TTu0U_wLjO&_nc_ht=scontent-ort2-2.xx&oh=1c45521536cd4f96ca7cf7469b28e49f&oe=5D538587)
don't let him see the 2009 version of star trek....Oh I get it, because seeing himself in it would no doubt rip a hole in the space time continuum? :o
(https://scontent-ort2-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/61557435_10158086454815752_5294432041482321920_n.jpg?_nc_cat=1&_nc_oc=AQlKhzfYAVwYIVQt-oBuEoOlIKHm-3upw6eU3NsAJL0Vyv3hIZHLzTnIo2rAGJsGrWXMta1oOadXy7TTu0U_wLjO&_nc_ht=scontent-ort2-2.xx&oh=1c45521536cd4f96ca7cf7469b28e49f&oe=5D538587)Even with Peter Parker being a kid I think he would have to have enough geek cred to tell Thor not to watch the prequels.
Even with Peter Parker being a kid I think he would have to have enough geek cred to tell Thor not to watch the prequels.
Do kids in their late teens actually like the prequels now, though? I can understand being a guilty pleasure since they saw them as little kids. But once they're old enough to actually know something about movies, I would think they'd at least see the issues with them.Even with Peter Parker being a kid I think he would have to have enough geek cred to tell Thor not to watch the prequels.
He's young enough to like them though.
Do kids in their late teens actually like the prequels now, though? I can understand being a guilty pleasure since they saw them as little kids. But once they're old enough to actually know something about movies, I would think they'd at least see the issues with them.I was trying to find some data on IMDB to give me a definitive answer to that question and it seems like those under 18 give Phantom Menace the lowest score of all the age demographics, which is if I'm reading the data right about a 5.8/10 and I'm guessing that's the median? Mean? I'm not entirely sure how to interpret everything. For attack of the clones it seems to be just a tiny bit lower, about a 5.7/10. But from there suddenly the score skyrockets for Revenge of the Sith all the way to a 7.5/10. Again, that's the average score for males and females under 18. The other age groups 18-29, 30-44, and 45+ all give similar scores, with little variance.
Yeah, the youngsters completely and (mostly) unironically love Star Wars prequels. I think they're derided by older fans because they were being targeted at the younger audience, and it worked!
It's these NEW Star Wars movies that they don't like.
And so it will probably continue...
The only thing that worries me is the cost of Disney+... how much is that going to be per month? Because I might actually have to drop my Amazon prime subscription so I can watch Loki, WandaVision, Hawkeye, What If? but most importantly The Falcon and the Winter Soldier.
One interesting thing about that announcement? The title for the already-reserved release spot of July 31, 2020 STILL has no title to go with it.
The untitled film originally slated for release on July 31, 2020 has now been removed from the schedule with no new release date announced.
At the end of the panel, Feige had one more ace up his sleeve, revealing that a Fantastic Four movie set in the Marvel Cinematic Universe is on the way, as well as mentioning Black Panther 2, Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3, Captain Marvel 2 and Blade. No word just yet on any casting or release dates.from here: https://www.gamesradar.com/marvel-fantastic-four-mcu-sdcc-2019-announcement/
Although now I see they may not be connected to the MCU? That would be a weird way to go.
Although now I see they may not be connected to the MCU? That would be a weird way to go.
agents of shield (where robbie first showed up as ghost rider) has only been tenuously connected for a while now, so it's not that weird.
So do we still not know who Keanu Reeves is playing?
I really hope X-Men leads into Avengers 5. Also, is there any chance at all that Disney will be gracious enough to consider casting Ian Mackellan and Patrick Stewart back into their respective roles? I feel a lot of hope for that possibility since they brought JK Simmons back.It's going to be at least several years before any X-Men movie, we'll be lucky if they are still alive by then. And since Marvel won't want to confuse timelines with the Fox movies, we won't get McAvoy or Fassbender either.
I really hope X-Men leads into Avengers 5. Also, is there any chance at all that Disney will be gracious enough to consider casting Ian Mackellan and Patrick Stewart back into their respective roles? I feel a lot of hope for that possibility since they brought JK Simmons back.It's going to be at least several years before any X-Men movie, we'll be lucky if they are still alive by then. And since Marvel won't want to confuse timelines with the Fox movies, we won't get McAvoy or Fassbender either.
I actually wouldn't be surprised to see a Deadpool flick before we get X-Men. He's in a unique position to be able to wink and joke about actor changes, questionable continuity, etc. They wouldn't necessarily even have to integrate him into the MCU. (He was never really integrated into the X-Men universe...)The fact that Disney told Fox to keep making Deadpool movies like they have been shows a surprisingly mature attitude towards it. You'd think they'd grab hold of the reigns immediately because it is such a cash cow.
Disney-Sony Standoff Ends Marvel Studios & Kevin Feige’s Involvement In ‘Spider-Man’ (https://deadline.com/2019/08/kevin-feige-spider-man-franchise-exit-disney-sony-dispute-avengers-endgame-captain-america-winter-soldier-tom-rothman-bob-iger-1202672545/)
Shit:I guarantee you this is not the end. Marvel/Disney will do whatever it takes to make sure that Spiderman 3-... I mean the next Spiderman installment is part of the MCU.QuoteDisney-Sony Standoff Ends Marvel Studios & Kevin Feige’s Involvement In ‘Spider-Man’ (https://deadline.com/2019/08/kevin-feige-spider-man-franchise-exit-disney-sony-dispute-avengers-endgame-captain-america-winter-soldier-tom-rothman-bob-iger-1202672545/)
Marvel rightly wanted more money from Sony, for basically MAKING the studio successful with Spider-Man (finally), and giving Sony their highest-grossing film EVER. Sony was greedy. End talks.
Shit:I guarantee you this is not the end. Marvel/Disney will do whatever it takes to make sure that Spiderman 3-... I mean the next Spiderman installment is part of the MCU.QuoteDisney-Sony Standoff Ends Marvel Studios & Kevin Feige’s Involvement In ‘Spider-Man’ (https://deadline.com/2019/08/kevin-feige-spider-man-franchise-exit-disney-sony-dispute-avengers-endgame-captain-america-winter-soldier-tom-rothman-bob-iger-1202672545/)Marvel rightly wanted more money from Sony, for basically MAKING the studio successful with Spider-Man (finally), and giving Sony their highest-grossing film EVER. Sony was greedy. End talks.
I also don't think that Sony will reboot Spider-Man entirely. There's no reason they can't makemorebad movies with Tom Holland and just not mention other MCU characters.
New Details Behind the Sony-Marvel Divorce Emerge (https://mcuexchange.com/new-details-sony-marvel-divorce/)
* According to the trade, Disney was asking for a 30% share from all Feige-produced Spidey films and not 50% as Deadline originally reported yesterday.
* THR’s sources are saying that in the wake of the acclaim of Spider-Man: Into the Spiderverse and box-office domination of Venom, films Sony produced without the help of Marvel Studios, executives are more confident in their ability to make their own Spidey films. The belief among executives is that they’ve “learned everything they need to know from Feige.”
* Tom Holland has an option for one more movie while director Jon Watts has fulfilled his 2-picture deal.
How The Marvel-Sony 'Spider-Man' Dispute Will Be Solved One Way Or Another [Updated] (https://www.forbes.com/sites/markhughes/2019/08/21/how-the-marvel-sony-spider-man-dispute-will-be-solved-one-way-or-another/)
Ooh! She-Hulk! I hope we get a lot of lawyering.
They'll have to digitally stretch Ally Mcbeal because she's way too skinny to be She-hulk.Ooh! She-Hulk! I hope we get a lot of lawyering.all they're gonna do is re-run ally mcbeal, but digitally paint over calista flockhart.
You Can Preorder Disney Plus For Less Than $4 A Month (https://www.scarymommy.com/disney-plus-4-dollars-month-preorder/)
If one knows they'll subscribe to Disney+, and can afford the upfront charge ($70), this is a great deal.What? So on November 12th I have to pay $70 up front to get Disney plus?!QuoteYou Can Preorder Disney Plus For Less Than $4 A Month (https://www.scarymommy.com/disney-plus-4-dollars-month-preorder/)
If one knows they'll subscribe to Disney+, and can afford the upfront charge ($70), this is a great deal.What? So on November 12th I have to pay $70 up front to get Disney plus?!QuoteYou Can Preorder Disney Plus For Less Than $4 A Month (https://www.scarymommy.com/disney-plus-4-dollars-month-preorder/)
If one knows they'll subscribe to Disney+, and can afford the upfront charge ($70), this is a great deal.What? So on November 12th I have to pay $70 up front to get Disney plus?!QuoteYou Can Preorder Disney Plus For Less Than $4 A Month (https://www.scarymommy.com/disney-plus-4-dollars-month-preorder/)
Only if you want the discount, and pay up front for 3 years, and first you have to join the Disney fan club D23 (apparently you can join the free version of the club and still get an invite for the discount). Also you have to pre-order by September 2 to get the discount.
Basically do all that and get 3 years of D+ for the cost of one year, or about $2 a month off the regular price.
If one knows they'll subscribe to Disney+, and can afford the upfront charge ($70), this is a great deal.What? So on November 12th I have to pay $70 up front to get Disney plus?!QuoteYou Can Preorder Disney Plus For Less Than $4 A Month (https://www.scarymommy.com/disney-plus-4-dollars-month-preorder/)
Only if you want the discount, and pay up front for 3 years, and first you have to join the Disney fan club D23 (apparently you can join the free version of the club and still get an invite for the discount). Also you have to pre-order by September 2 to get the discount.
Basically do all that and get 3 years of D+ for the cost of one year, or about $2 a month off the regular price.
AND live in the US, I assume?
Valid for US residents with US payment method only
'New Warriors' Fails To Find Network And Has Been Dropped (https://mcuexchange.com/new-warriors-dropped/)
After years of waiting, news has finally broke from Geeks WorldWide that some may have been dreading. Since New Warriors has been unable to find a network, it has officially been dropped. Despite high-level executives apparently loving the un-aired pilot for the show, it couldn’t find a network to call home. They even shopped it at Disney+ and Hulu, but were turned away. We don’t have any idea then why it couldn’t secure a network, since it seemed to be so well received.
Couldn’t have been for budgetary reasons, since the show was described as a half-hour docu-comedy in the vein of The Office. Regardless, it’s a sad situation all around for the cast and showrunner, Kevin Biegel, who seemed quite passionate about the prospective show. Whatever the future may hold for these characters, I’m sure it’s not the last we’ll hear from them.
Well... this sucks....I'll probably have to check that out on a bootleg from a convention.Quote'New Warriors' Fails To Find Network And Has Been Dropped (https://mcuexchange.com/new-warriors-dropped/)
After years of waiting, news has finally broke from Geeks WorldWide that some may have been dreading. Since New Warriors has been unable to find a network, it has officially been dropped. Despite high-level executives apparently loving the un-aired pilot for the show, it couldn’t find a network to call home. They even shopped it at Disney+ and Hulu, but were turned away. We don’t have any idea then why it couldn’t secure a network, since it seemed to be so well received.
Couldn’t have been for budgetary reasons, since the show was described as a half-hour docu-comedy in the vein of The Office. Regardless, it’s a sad situation all around for the cast and showrunner, Kevin Biegel, who seemed quite passionate about the prospective show. Whatever the future may hold for these characters, I’m sure it’s not the last we’ll hear from them.
Man, I would have thought that would be the EXACT kind of show that Disney+ would want to jump on.
On the plus side (if I may cross-post)I'm not surprised. It seemed inevitable they would work something out.Guess what? (https://news.avclub.com/staying-together-for-the-kids-sony-and-marvel-strike-a-1838529276)(https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/911/786/8bc.gif)
I don't get anything at all from that GIF by itself that Spider-Man is in the MCU again. Heck, the GIF might've been for Spider-Man: Far from Home, or could be just a clip from one of the films, period (i.e. with no 'ulterior motive' behind it existing).On the plus side (if I may cross-post)I'm not surprised. It seemed inevitable they would work something out.Guess what? (https://news.avclub.com/staying-together-for-the-kids-sony-and-marvel-strike-a-1838529276)(https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/911/786/8bc.gif)
Spider-Man 3 . . . . July 16, 2021
:)Spider-Man 3 . . . . July 16, 2021as per the preivous two movies' titles, this one'll be called spider-man: homerun, and it'll be about petey trying to start his baseball career.
I'm hoping Scorpion is the villain in Spiderman 3, since he was teased in the end credits of Homecoming. It seems odd that they would have done that without putting him in Far From Home.Scorpion... Chameleon. Ahh... WHAT IF...
https://au.ign.com/articles/doctor-strange-2-director-drops-out?sf115684273=1This is making me concerned. I hope the studio isn't holding back on the horror elements.
Doctor Strange 2 Director Drops Out
https://au.ign.com/articles/doctor-strange-2-director-drops-out?sf115684273=1
Doctor Strange 2 Director Drops Out
https://au.ign.com/articles/doctor-strange-2-director-drops-out?sf115684273=1
Doctor Strange 2 Director Drops Out
Hmm, may I make a suggestion:
(https://pmcvariety.files.wordpress.com/2017/04/guillermo-del-toro.png?w=1000&h=562&crop=1)
Arrrgh. Howard needs to get his due. He's so much more than that goofy character from a bad George Lucas movie and the world needs to see that.He could join the GoTG... I mean it's not exactly outside the realm of possibility. I'm sure at some point or at least in some What if issue, Howard the Duck was paling around with Groot and Rocket.
[blue text is link to article - there are three links in here:]
While all production of MCU properties have been put on hold (https://mcuexchange.com/marvel-studios-shut-down-production-indefinitely/) due to COVID-19, Disney has shuffled release dates for those properties (https://www.polygon.com/2020/4/3/21207315/new-marvel-movie-release-dates-eternals-thor-4-captain-marvel-2) for the next couple years. These have been added to my updated-when-needed post of all MCU releases (http://forum.rifftrax.com/index.php?topic=32583.msg962019#msg962019).
I have read nothing as yet about the Oct 2022 release. It is possible that with the hiatus of the studio for potentially 6-10 months this year, that release, which would be the first of the 4-films-a-year schedule, will be dropped. I'm hoping not, since the other three 2022 releases are all bunched up in the first seven months of 2022, but it is possible.
UPCOMING:
Black Widow . . . . Nov 6, 2020
Falcon & The Winter Soldier Disney+ . . . . Fall 2020
WandaVision (no: not WonkaVision) Disney+ . . . . Fall 2020
Hellstrom Hulu series . . . . ? ?, 2020
The Eternals . . . . Feb 12, 2021
Shang-Chi and the Legend of the 10 Rings . . . . May 7, 2021
Loki Disney+ . . . . [Spring 2021]
Doctor Strange 2: In The Multiverse of Madness . . . . Nov. 5, 2021
Spider-Man 3 . . . . July 16, 2021
"What If?" Disney+ animated series . . . . Summer 2021
Hawkeye Disney+ . . . . Fall 2021
Thor: Love and Thunder . . . . Feb. 28, 2022
Black Panther 2 . . . . May 8, 2022
Captain Marvel 2 . . . . July 8, 2022
as-yet untitled Marvel movie . . . . Oct. 7, 2022