March 11, 2010, 01:45:03 AM
News: New Short: "The Story of a Teenage Drug Addict" Now Available!
Pages: [1]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Good classical music?  (Read 307 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Thrifty
Bilbo Baggins Balladeer
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 4105


« on: November 20, 2009, 07:28:49 AM »

I'd like to add come classical music to my iPod.  When I tried to find some, I realized this can be a pretty broad term, so I ended up sorta overwhelmed.

I know a lot of names; Mozart, Beethoven, Wagner, Chopin, Strauss, Brahms, Salieri.  But I have no idea what period they're from or what sort of music they produced.

Okay, to make a broad question only slightly less broad, here's what I'm looking for.  Basically anything instrumental.  NO OPERA.  I hate opera.  My dad piped that shit all over the house when I was growing up, and it drove me nuts.  I'd really like some straight instrumental arrangements with no vocals.  So who created that sort of music?
Logged

Imrahil
Gryffindork
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 14569


You can concern yourself with bigger things...


« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2009, 07:34:18 AM »

Lots and lots of people.

As far as easing into it...I personally find the Romantic era the easiest to start on.  Try some Tchaikovsky and see how you like him; his 4th Symphony is quite good, as is the 1812 overture (which was the first classical piece I fell in love with at around age...oh, 11 or 12 I suppose).

Mozart's Eine Kleine Nachtmusik is pretty good as well, and fits your criteria.

Or you might prefer the baroque/classical period, in which case I'd suggest trying out Bach's Brandenburg Concertos; a lot less variation in tone, but a lot more constant in tempo; this is sort of mathematical, "pure music."

If you like more programmatic music--music that tells a story--you might try Respighi's Fountains of Rome/Pines of Rome (get one with liner notes, or read about them on the internet), or Debussy's La Mer.

Oh, and by the bye--not all choral is at all operatic (i.e., soloists).  I don't much care for that either, but some massed choral stuff is great.  And if you can get Wagner without words (there's an album called Der Ring Ohne Worter, "The Ring without Words") which is excellent.
« Last Edit: November 20, 2009, 09:10:07 AM by Imrahil » Logged

mrbasehart
Disembaudio's Squadio
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 12408


Movie-Watching Machine


« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2009, 07:59:24 AM »

I like Chopin's piano works, like Impromptu Fantasy or Raindrops and Claude Debussy's Claire de Lune is one of the most beautiful things I've ever heard. 

That's really the extent of my Classical musical knowledge.  Smiley
Logged

Monty
The FBI Pays Me to Surf
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2184


C30, C60, C90, Go!


« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2009, 08:58:16 AM »

The soundtrack to the 1994 Gary Oldman film, "Immortal Beloved" is a good starting point for Beethoven.  One of my favorite classical music CD's.  It is still in print or available used on Amazon for cheap.
Logged

torgosPizza
Administrator
Dragon Ryder
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6668


I'll take you 'round the Universe.


« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2009, 09:49:15 AM »

Mike is a HUGE classical music nut. He and I share some common interests in that regard. Check out some works by Scarlatti, there are two of them, one is more opera than the other. But there are a couple instrumental albums I had that are phenomenal. Anything from the Baroque period is pretty great, IMO.
Logged

Want to help contribute directly to RiffTrax site development? Donate! | Find me on Facebook
Imrahil
Gryffindork
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 14569


You can concern yourself with bigger things...


« Reply #5 on: November 20, 2009, 09:54:14 AM »

Mike is a HUGE classical music nut. He and I share some common interests in that regard. Check out some works by Scarlatti, there are two of them, one is more opera than the other. But there are a couple instrumental albums I had that are phenomenal. Anything from the Baroque period is pretty great, IMO.

I'm not really a fan of the baroque. It's more "pure music" than other periods are, which is something I find tedious about it. It's also got pretty simplistic themes that get repeated a lot, and pretty much constant motion.

Didn't know that about Mike, though, that's interesting, and cool that you get to share that with him.
Logged

Tripe H. Redux
Tells No Tales
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 25697


Do you really want to hurt me?


WWW
« Reply #6 on: November 20, 2009, 10:11:01 AM »

Ok try some of the following

William Grant Still
Antonin Dvorak
Edward Elgar
George Frideric Handel


Claude Debussy's Claire de Lune
Isn't terribly representative of his other work, but Debussy is good if you like less traditional, more Avant-garde, music

Logged

jewishcarpenter
Bilbo Baggins Balladeer
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 4583


I have "The Midas Touch"... OF DEATH


« Reply #7 on: November 20, 2009, 10:38:53 AM »

I'm a fan of Liszt, Beethoven, Chopin, Rachmaninoff, Scriabin. Earlier stuff like Bach never really struck me as something to listen to. It (to me anyways) lacks emotion, it seems more of a military march than a song I would regularly enjoy. I mainly listen to classical piano although I do also like choral arrangements from time to time. If you want some specific suggestions please let me know.
Logged

Imrahil
Gryffindork
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 14569


You can concern yourself with bigger things...


« Reply #8 on: November 20, 2009, 10:50:08 AM »

Ok try some of the following

William Grant Still
Antonin Dvorak
Edward Elgar
George Frideric Handel


Claude Debussy's Claire de Lune
Isn't terribly representative of his other work, but Debussy is good if you like less traditional, more Avant-garde, music



Avant-garde for its day, perhaps, but certainly not now--I think a lot of modern soundtracks show impressionist tendencies.  I mean we're not talking Schoenberg or Bartok or whatever.
Logged

Tripe H. Redux
Tells No Tales
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 25697


Do you really want to hurt me?


WWW
« Reply #9 on: November 20, 2009, 10:58:54 AM »

Avant-garde for its day, perhaps,

Which would be the context in which I was using it. Nothing "perhaps" about it. Smiley
Logged

Imrahil
Gryffindork
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 14569


You can concern yourself with bigger things...


« Reply #10 on: November 20, 2009, 11:12:55 AM »

I don't think that was clear from your post.
Logged

D.B. Barnes
Not Hurt By Pain
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1678



« Reply #11 on: November 20, 2009, 12:08:01 PM »

I'll throw in these two:

Mozart's Jupiter Symphony (Symphony No. 41)

Rachmaninoff's Piano Concerto No. 2
Logged

Tripe H. Redux
Tells No Tales
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 25697


Do you really want to hurt me?


WWW
« Reply #12 on: November 20, 2009, 01:07:18 PM »

I don't think that was clear from your post.

But "avant-garde" is a tad déclassé, it's has more of a historical relevance than anything else.

Anyway, if you like romantics Debussy is a nice gentle transition from that to more experimental forms.

It's a nice step towards Messiaen and others Smiley
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
Print
Jump to:  

Page created in 0.055 seconds with 22 queries.