Sorry to burst your bubble there, Ducky, but, I read something (forgot where....cba to look it up now), a woman was pre-interviewed because she was there. She made it VERY CLEAR that she was NOT homeless. When they asked her how long she had been homeless, she decided to play along, but, was taken aback.
I haven't seen this documentary and I don't know if credits are listed as far as those they interviewed goes. Basically Wiseau presented lies in this gripping documentary.
And
Trekkees couldn't even get people's names right when they identified them onscreen and most of the people interviewed have serious issues about how they were portrayed (like the one Spiner fan who they claimed had even bought a house near him when she'd actually been living in that same house before he moved to the area). Yet people still think that "documentary" is brilliant.
I saw that entry from the non-homeless woman on IMDB.com. I'm glad she got to defend herself since evidently being identified as homeless is some kind of Scarlet Letter she couldn't live with. I don't remember seeing any other people coming forward like that - or are we assuming that everyone who was homeless back when this was made still are.
So you only know of
A lie, not "lies" as you state.
She also
doesn't say that it was Wiseau who interviewed her for this - and I doubt she would forget
that face - so maybe he knew nothing about what went on in the pre-interview? So now even though he wasn't there it's his fault she didn't have enough spine to stand up to the interviewers on camera? What if it was his co-director who did it all without his knowledge? Maybe it was Greg Sestero who did that interview? He was probably felling Wiseau that
The Room was brilliant the whole time they were making it so how trustworthy is he?
I haven't seen the documentary - maybe it
is shitty and maybe his motives were good or weren't the best.
I just pointed out that he worked on a film about the homeless and the people who are trying to help them and so far all we know is that he and his co-director got an award for it and no one in the charitable community, the celebs interviewed or the Mayor of L.A. wants him lynched for what they did.
There's no fucking "bubble" to burst. That's what "maybe" before "he isn't such an utter douche" meant.